Press release: Indonesian giant sea wall project is pseudo-solution for Jakarta Bay
21 April 2017: Jakarta is sinking. Excessive groundwater extraction is causing the metropolis to sink by dozens of centimetres each year, making it more vulnerable to flooding. Dutch businesses have come up with a solution: an immense sea wall on the coast, which is also a stunning real estate project. But this intervention is just a pseudo-solution, say researchers from Both ENDS, Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen (SOMO) and the Transnational Institute (TNI) today in a new report. Even worse, the project threatens the livelihoods of tens of thousands of people employed in local fisheries.
"A solution must be found – that's clear", says Katrin McGauran of SOMO, "But no measure taken will have any effect if the sinking of the city isn't stopped first. The sinking is caused by the fact that everyone, including businesses, pumps up their drinking water from underground. The huge infrastructural project proposed by the Dutch companies won't solve this problem".
Late 2015, the Dutch government granted a consortium of Dutch businesses 8 million euros to further develop the plan for the Indonesian government. Of this sum, 7.5 million euros originated from the Dutch Ministry of Development Cooperation. A sum of 3.9 million euros from the same source was previously granted to the plan.
The National Capital Integrated Coastal Development project (NCICD) has proposed building a giant dike before the coast of Jakarta, combined with the creation of an artificial island, on which a new city district will be built. The project will be financed through real estate sales. The investment required could be as high as US$40 billion.
No voice for local people
Ten thousand people employed in the fisheries sector in Jakarta fear that the Indonesian mega-dike will cause them to lose their livelihoods. Fishers informed SOMO, Both ENDS and TNI that they have already lost income due to the present construction of artificial islands in the bay, in which Dutch companies are involved. Once the dike is built, the fishers will no longer have free access to the open sea.
According to Satoko Kishimoto of TNI, privatisation of the water supply in Jakarta, 18 years ago, worsened the problems: "By taking back management of the water supply, Jakarta would be able to solve this urgent problem much more quickly. The Dutch government could play an important part in this".
In 2016, the 'Save the Jakarta Bay Coalition', which has united fishers with others who are also affected since 2014, sent two letters to Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte to express concerns regarding the NCICD and to request that the Netherlands exert pressure on the Indonesian government. But until now, there has been no official response. The fishers and residents have not been sufficiently consulted in the project and their interests were never properly taken into account.
The mega-dike threatens to turn Jakarta Bay into a large, polluted lagoon. Moreover, in order to realise the dike and the new city district, large quantities of sand are needed. This will further stimulate illegal sand mining, which is already a problem for Indonesia. Illegal sand mining causes serious damage to invaluable ecosystems such as coral reefs.
"In supporting Dutch businesses abroad, it would be only logical if the Dutch government applied the same standards as in the Netherlands", says Giacomo Galli, who maintains contact for Both ENDS with the fishers' organisations. "The consequences of the project for people and their environment should be properly considered, local residents should have a say, and they should be compensated for damages suffered. These procedures are the norm in the Netherlands. The Dutch government could make a difference by focusing on these procedures in such a large-scale international project as well."
Or contact Giacomo Galli: G.Galli@bothends / +31-205306624
For more information
Read more about this subject
Large-scale infrastructural projects have detrimental effects on local people and the environment, while their benefits are felt elsewhere. Both ENDS is working to ensure that local people have a greater say in decision-making and is investigating the way these projects are funded.
Publication / 21 April 2017
Publication / 21 April 2017
Together with civil society organisations from all over the world, the Fair Green and Global (FGG) Alliance aims for socially just, inclusive and environmentally sustainable societies in the Netherlands and the Global South.
External link / 31 May 2018
November 2017. A delegation of the Dutch dredging company Van Oord listens to fishermen from communities around Suape harbour, Brazil. For the fishing communities, the meeting meant a long-awaited breakthrough in their efforts to have their grievances heard. Their fishing grounds have been damaged ever since Van Oord started deepening the sea access channel to the port seven years ago.
Blog / 16 June 2020
In September 2019, the streets of Jakarta were filled with angry demonstrators protesting against the Omnibus Employment Law. The law will ease the rules for mining, make it much more difficult to hold companies liable for criminal acts and severely restrict the power of the national anti-corruption committee. At the moment, such protests are completely impossible in Indonesia because of the COVID-19 crisis and the associated lockdown measures. And Indonesian people already had few other means of exerting influence on decision-making and legislative processes.
News / 2 July 2019
In the Nam Ou river in Northern Laos, seven dams are built by a Chinese company. All over the world one can see the same picture when it comes to hydropower projects: it has devastating impacts on the people living in or around the area where they are being built, primarily because they are being displaced. It seems that displacement of communities is still accepted as the unavoidable collateral damage of infrastructure projects. This reveals a highly unacceptable attitude towards poor communities in whose name development is proceeding. In Laos, our Laotian partner visited communities along the river to talk with people about their life after displacement:
Publication / 29 May 2019
News / 4 August 2017
A report published yesterday by Amnesty Central America shows that the plans for a new canal leads to numerous violations of human rights in Nicaragua. And that's even before the works have started. Many organisations therefore protest against the canal, supported by Both ENDS.
News / 16 August 2016
10 songs: that is the result of a 4 day long, 450 km boat trip through the Pantanal with 36 people. The project Pantanal Poética sought and found a new way to look at the Pantanal, a valuable but threatened nature reserve on the border of Brazil, Bolivia and Paraguay.
News / 13 April 2015
For several decades, Both ENDS has been closely following the developments in this large water area in the centre of South America. We work closely with organisations which aim to ensure that the local population knows about these developments and, if necessary, protect it from these changes. But why is this area both so special and important for the whole of South America? And what exactly is threatening this area? C. Cornell Evers, independent photographer and writer, spoke with Tamara Mohr of Both ENDS and Sander van Andel of IUCN to find answers. The result of this meeting is an interesting interview.
Publication / 4 October 2019
Blog / 13 November 2018
Last weekend there was an article in Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant about the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project in Kenya. I was surprised and angry about how the story was presented. How can people be so blind to the perspectives of others? And how can a progressive paper like De Volkskrant devote so much space to such an unnuanced account? This is exactly why such projects lead to conflicts.
News / 2 November 2015
The Pantanal, in the heart of South America, at the border of Brazil, Bolivia and Paraguay, is the world’s largest freshwater wetland with an extremely rich biodiversity. Tourism and fishing are the main sources of income for the local population. This enormous natural area is invaluable for the water management of a large part of the continent, stretching all the way down to the Argentinian La Plata area, some 1,500 kilometres away. The area faces many threats and Both ENDS therefore already started actively supporting local organisations striving to protect the Pantanal in 1994.
Publication / 2 December 2014
Publication / 5 December 2012
A Negotiated Approach envisages the meaningful and long-term participation of communities in all aspects of managing the water and other natural resources on which their lives depend. It seeks to achieve healthy ecosystems and equitable sharing of benefits among all stakeholders within a river basin.
Blog / 1 February 2019
Saturday morning, call time at the office is five o'clock. The group of ten people arriving is still half asleep. Like almost every weekend Kalikasan PNE, the organisation where I'm conducting my internship, organizes a field trip. Today, we will we visit one of the fisher communities in Bulakan, where the new airport of Manila is planned.
News / 26 September 2018
Good news from Brazil! The National Water Agency (ANA) has stopped issuing new permits for the construction of hydroelectric dams in the Brazilian Paraguay river basin, which is part of the Pantanal wetlands in South-America. The suspension will last at least until May 2020, after the publication of a comprehensive socio-economic and environmental impact assessment that the ANA started in 2016.
News / 5 July 2019
Manila Bay is crucial site for biodiversity and home to over 23 million people, but their wellbeing is at risk due to reclamation projects, which are part of a large-scale top-down masterplan for the bay. It is estimated that more than 11 million people are threatened with displacement due to land reclamations and related disaster risks. As an alternative, Kalikasan is developing a People's Plan.