Independent research confirms FMO’s responsibility for destruction caused by Barro Blanco dam, recommends compensation
Utrecht, xx september 2022 - Dutch development bank FMO bears responsibility for the destruction of livelihoods, economic losses and environmental damage caused by the construction of the Barro Blanco dam in Panama, according to a report by the bank's Independent Complaints Mechanism (ICM). Indigenous communities affected by the dam are pleased that their complaints have been confirmed and reiterate their call for apologies and compensation.
Despite protests from members of the Indigenous Ngäbe-Buglé people, in 2011 FMO decided to fund the construction of the dam on the Tabasará River. Supported by the Dutch NGOs Both ENDS and SOMO, the local organization M10 subsequently filed a complaint on behalf of the community to the ICM* which found that the project violated FMO's human rights and environmental policies in May 2015.
Today, the ICM released its long-awaited final report on the complaint. It establishes that, following FMO's exit from the project in April 2021, the project remains in non-compliance with the banks' policies. As FMO has not resolved the environmental damages and impacts on the livelihoods of the local population, the ICM recommends the bank to also apologize publicly and to compensate for the damage.
FMO did not follow its own human rights and environmental policy
"We are pleased that an independent investigation has finally confirmed that FMO did not adhere to its own human rights and environmental standards at the time, and that the negative consequences of this are still being felt to this day", says Nick Middeldorp of Both ENDS. "We pointed out to FMO from the start that there had been no proper consultation of the indigenous population and that the dam would cause major environmental, economic, social and cultural damage. Nonetheless, FMO chose to continue financing the dam, and so far it did not do much to address the adverse impacts. We would like to continue to discuss with FMO how they can take responsibility and contribute to repair this damage, as far as possible, and how they can prevent violations like these in the future."
"The ICM report finally acknowledges that under international, Dutch and Panamanian law the right to free, prior and informed consent was required at the time of the financial agreement" says Luis Scungio, researcher at SOMO. "Yet, the disregard to this fundamental right has led to devastating impacts, including loss of income and livelihood as well as psychological distress due to the repression of community opposition to the project. We therefore fully support the ICM's conclusion that the Barro Blanco project breached the Indigenous right to development based on the preservation of their territories and cultural identity. As the unresolved harms affect all members of the community and not only those who lost land to the dam's reservoir, they all need to be adequately compensated."
Report opens the way to apologies and compensation
The report's conclusions also reinforce the demand for apologies and compensation for the affected community members. "The ICM has said the correct thing. The banks did not comply with their social and environmental obligations before approving the credit for this project", says Manolo Miranda of M10. "We demanded the banks and other stakeholders of the project to comply with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which clearly states that the development of projects that affect Indigenous peoples need to have their consent. Instead the banks ignored our early concerns, leaving the community to live with the harms caused by the project. With this study, we hope the banks will now take responsibility for the permanent impacts that we continue to suffer."
Both ENDS and SOMO will continue to support M10 and urge FMO to handle this case as best as possible, and to follow the recommendations of the ICM.
Note for editors:
The ICM, or Independent Complaint Mechanism, is a shared complaint mechanism of the banks FMO, the German DEG and the French development bank Proparco. In the event of a complaint, the complaints mechanism examines whether the banks comply with their own human rights and environmental policies and, where necessary, makes recommendations for conflict resolution and the repair of damages suffered.
For more information:
Nick Middeldorp, Both ENDS:
Luis Scungio, SOMO:
For more information
Read more about this subject
The Barro Blanco dam project in Panama, which has Dutch financial support, is causing indigenous lands to disappear under water. Both ENDS is working to protect the rights of indigenous communities living near the dam.
Development banks should comply with strict environmental and human rights rules to ensure that their projects benefit and do not harm the poorest groups. Both ENDS monitors the banks to make sure they do.
News / 6 April 2017
The closing of the Barro Blanco dam last year caused not only material but also cultural damage in the affected Ngäbe-Buglé communities in Panama. So far, funder FMO is not taking responsibility for the human rights abuses caused by the project. So, what now?
News / 27 July 2021
In April 2021, the Dutch development bank FMO announced that it is no longer involved in the Barro Blanco project, a controversial dam in Panama. GENISA, the Panamanian company that built the dam, unexpectedly paid off the multi-million dollar loan early. The question is to what extent, now that the bank is no longer actively financing the project, FMO can still be held responsible for the damage and suffering that was caused when this was still the case.
News / 8 November 2021
Both ENDS and SOMO condemn violence against Indigenous community near the Barro Blanco dam in Panama
Members of the Indigenous Ngäbe Buglé people were brutally attacked by Panamanian police on Friday 29 October 2021 from a parcel of private land near the FMO-financed Barro Blanco hydroelectric dam. The victims, all members of the anti-dam movement M22, had peacefully occupied the land after their protest camp got dismantled in July this year.
Indigenous Hondurans are resisting the construction of the Agua Zarca hydrodam. Their fight has cost several lives, including that of Berta Cáceres. After considerable public pressure, Dutch development bank FMO withdrew from the project.
Large-scale infrastructural projects have detrimental effects on local people and the environment, while their benefits are felt elsewhere. Both ENDS is working to ensure that local people have a greater say in decision-making and is investigating the way these projects are funded.
Press release / 10 February 2021
The Dutch development bank FMO is not sufficiently transparent about the projects it finances and is therefore acting contrary to its mandate. This is evident from a new report published by the International Accountability Project (IAP) and the Foundation for the Development of Sustainable Policies (FUNDEPS), endorsed by 28 organizations including Both ENDS, SOMO, and Oxfam Novib. The research assesses FMO's disclosure and access to information practices for investments proposed between January 1, 2019, and May 31, 2020. Only in 25% of the cases was it disclosed what potential negative consequences an investment by FMO would have for people and the environment.
News / 23 December 2021
2022 is the year for FMO to make good on its promises and provide financial support only to sustainable development
2021 was a turbulent year for Dutch development bank FMO, to say the least. The bank has been under fire for many years for investments linked to human rights violations and suspected corruption. But in the past year, the Dutch press and media have reported on one new development after the other in ongoing cases involving FMO. Below we give a short summary of these cases and call on FMO to make the promised improvements in 2022.
Together with civil society organisations from all over the world, the Fair Green and Global (FGG) Alliance aims for socially just, inclusive and environmentally sustainable societies in the Netherlands and the Global South.
External link / 31 May 2018
Sometimes things must go terribly wrong before big players start to move. In March 2016, Honduran activist Berta Cáceres was murdered because of her leading role in the protests against the Agua Zarca hydro dam, co-financed by the Dutch FMO. One and a half year later, FMO changed their policies to prevent such events in the future.
News / 1 December 2018
On Thursday, November 29, seven suspects of the murder of Berta Cáceres (in March 2016) were found guilty. Members of the indigenous human rights organisation COPINH, of which Cáceres was the leader, and close relatives of Cáceres herself see the ruling as the first step towards justice for her murder and the recognition that the company DESA is co-responsible for this. They also point out, however, that the process was permeated with corruption, intimidation and other abuses from the very beginning, and that the masterminds behind the murder are still walking around freely.
Publication / 11 February 2016
Blog / 13 November 2018
Last weekend there was an article in Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant about the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project in Kenya. I was surprised and angry about how the story was presented. How can people be so blind to the perspectives of others? And how can a progressive paper like De Volkskrant devote so much space to such an unnuanced account? This is exactly why such projects lead to conflicts.
News / 10 June 2022
In a new Position Statement on Financial Intermediary (FI) Lending, Dutch development bank FMO argues for limited responsibility over the outcomes investments that are channeled through commercial banks, investment funds, and other financial intermediaries, representing by far the bigger sector of its portfolio. In doing so, FMO is undermining its development mission, including the protection of human rights and addressing the climate crisis. FMO intends to delegate these key responsibilities to its FI clients only, falling short of best practices of peer financial institutions. In a joint submission prepared by Both ENDS, Oxfam Novib, Recourse and SOMO, we argue that FMO can do much more to ensure the protection of human rights, the environment, and to measure the development impact of its indirect investments.
Letter / 10 June 2022
Both ENDS, SOMO, Oxfam Novib and Recourse sent in a submission to FMO's public consultation on its Position Statement on Financial Intermediaries. In this position statement, FMO only takes limited responsibility for the consequences of its investments through so-called financial intermediaries. We call upon FMO to publish a position statement that focuses on protecting human rights and the environment and take full responsibility for this.
Letter / 9 November 2020
Both ENDS and partners gave their input on FMO's public consultation on Climate Action Commitments and Fossil Fuel Statement. Both ENDS and partners are pleased that FMO is finally taking a stand regarding fossil fuels, but in our opinion it could be more ambitious.
News / 26 October 2022
Update October 27th:
Today our friends have been released after five nights in detention. We welcome this great news and we are happy and relieved that Babacar Diouf and the others who were arrested will soon be back with their loved ones.
Nonetheless this was a very bad signal from Senegalese authorities and police and an indication of the growing restriction on civic space in Senegal. It is unacceptable that freedom of expression is restricted, people should not have to go to jail for peacefully expressing their opinion - especially when their livelihood is at stake.
News / 4 June 2021
FMO's new position statement on fossil fuel investments commits to ending new direct finance in the downstream and midstream coal and oil sectors, whilst still allowing for investments in gas-fired electricity generation under exceptional circumstances only. Both ENDS welcomes this development as a step in the right direction.
News / 10 November 2020
The Dutch development bank FMO has published a statement about fossil fuels to take steps in climate action. Both ENDS and partners are pleased that FMO is finally taking a stand regarding fossil fuels, but in our opinion it could be more ambitious. In order to really contribute to sustainability and equality, it is essential that development banks stop investing in harmful fossil projects.