Despite climate agreements, the Netherlands supports the fossil sector with 7.6 billion euros a year
Although outgoing economics minister Henk Kamp stated in May of this year that fossil fuels are not subsidised in the Netherlands, a report out today shows that this is clearly not the case. The report. ‘Phase-Out 2020: Monitoring Europe’s fossil fuel subsidies’, by the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and Climate Action Network Europe (CAN-Europe), says that the Netherlands is supporting the fossil sector at home and abroad with more than 7.6 billion euros a year (1). The Netherlands made international agreements as long ago as 2009 (2) to ban subsidies for fossil fuels. Environment NGO Milieudefensie and Both ENDS – both members of CAN-Europe – call attention to these findings because they find it unacceptable that the government perpetuates our dependence on fossil fuels in this way.
The report provides an overview of the substantial sums of money that eleven EU member states and the EU institutions continue to invest in the production and consumption of fossil fuels. In total, these investments come to 112 billon euros a year. The report concludes that most countries, including the Netherlands, have no concrete plans to phase out their fossil fuel subsidies.
“The government already has its work cut out to achieve the Paris goals,’ says Milieudefensie director Donald Pols. ‘So we shouldn’t be pumping money into the fossil sector. We can better invest the money in sustainable energy supplies – an area in which we are lagging seriously behind. Then we can also stop extracting gas in Groningen more quickly.”
The biggest fossil fuel subsidy in the Netherlands is the energy tax exemption for air transport and shipping, sectors that are way behind in terms of sustainability. The exemption poses a serious threat to achievement of the Paris goals, and costs the Netherlands 3.5 billion euros in lost tax revenues every year. The government also supports the oil and gas production industry in the Netherlands to the tune of 144 million euros a year. Investments by companies in the fossil sector that are largely in the hands of the state amount to 946 million euros a year.
The total amount with which the Netherlands supports the fossil industry every year is most probably much higher than the 7.6 billion euros calculated in the report. For almost half of the support measures the researchers identified, they could not determine exact amounts due to lack of transparency. Milieudefensie and Both ENDS find that unacceptable, as without transparency, it is almost impossible to determine whether the Netherlands is complying with its international agreements.
The Netherlands also supports the fossil fuel sector abroad with more than two billion euros a year. “It does this mainly in the form of export support,’ says Niels Hazekamp, policy advisor at Both ENDS. “The Dutch economy is strongly focused on exports and the government supports companies that are active abroad with, for example, export credit insurance to reduce their financial risks. By far the greatest share of export credit insurance goes to oil- and gas-related projects, while the Netherlands should really be supporting sustainable and innovative projects.”
For more information:
The full report Phase-Out 2020: Monitoring Europe’s fossil fuel subsidies
The executive summary of Phase-Out 2020: Monitoring Europe’s fossil fuel subsidies
Both ENDS' publication: Paris Proof Export Support: why and how the Dutch government must exclude credit support for fossil fuel
Contact
Milieudefensie press information:
020-5507333 of persvoorlichting@milieudefensie.nl
Both ENDS:
Niels Hazekamp 020-5306639 of n.hazekamp@bothends.org
Masja Helmer 020-5306637 of m.helmer@bothends.org
Notes:
(1) This consists of 4.4 billion euros in direct subsidies and fiscal arrangements, 2.2 billion in international public financing for oil and gas (by public financial bodies) and 946 million in investments by state companies in oil and gas.
(2) The European Union has committed itself to ending environmentally harmful subsidies by 2020. In addition, through the G20 and the G7, European governments have made international agreements to ban fossil fuels.
Photo: Oil transport on Student Energy
For more information
Themes
Read more about this subject
-
News / 11 December 2017
Stop funding fossils at the 'One Planet Summit' in Paris
Yesterday, the French President Macron, the President of the World Bank Group, Jim Yong Kim, and the Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, met with international leaders and committed citizens from around the world in Paris. According to the organisers, the aim of this gathering was to 'address the ecological emergency for our planet' as 'two years to the day after the historic Paris Agreement, it is time for concrete action.'
-
Publication / 18 June 2017
-
Press release / 14 May 2017
Criticism of Dutch pension fund ABP’s investments in coal, oil and gas
The Dutch pension fund, ABP, invested about two billion euros more in the fossil energy industry at the end of 2016 than the year before. This is announced by the report "Dirty & Dangerous: the fossil fuel investments of Dutch pension fund ABP," published today by Both ENDS, German urgewald and Fossielvrij NL. The report criticizes these investments because of the impact on the climate and the catastrophic consequences for the people in the areas where coal, oil and gas are being produced.
-
Dossier
Paris Proof Export Support
Two-thirds of the export credit insurances that Atradius DSB provided in the 2012-2015 period went to the fossil energy sector. That is contrary to the climate agreements that the Netherlands signed in Paris.
-
Dossier
The Netherlands and the SDGs: A better world starts with yourself
In 2015, the member states of the United Nations committed themselves to the ambitious Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Unlike their predecessors, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the SDGs recognise the importance of equality within and between countries, of decision-making processes in which all people are included and heard, and of legal systems that are independent and accessible to all.
-
Press release / 12 February 2019
Press Release: 6 organisations join climate lawsuit against Shell
Amsterdam, 12 February 2019 - Fossil fuel giant Royal Dutch Shell is facing legal action from environmental and human rights organisations if it fails to align its growth plans with global climate goals aimed at averting catastrophic global warming.
-
News / 8 November 2018
Our recommendations for the legislative review of Canada's Export Credit Agency
Every 10 years, the mandate and activities of 'Export Development Canada' (EDC), the Canadian export credit agency, are reviewed. Since the last review took place in 2008, another review is currently underway. Both ENDS and a couple of other CSOs working from a number of countries made a joint submission as formal input to the legislative review. We did this especially in light of the Canadian governments' ambition to show leadership on climate change and to prioritise climate change action and clean economic growth.
-
Dossier
The Climate lawsuit against Shell
Both ENDS is co-plaintiff in the climate lawsuit being brought by Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth The Netherlands) against Shell to stop the company from causing harm to the climate. Shell has known about the severity of the climate problem for many years but continues with the climate-polluting extraction of oil and gas. By doing so, it undermines efforts to achieve the climate goals. Companies have a responsibility not to cause serious harm to society and the climate. Because Shell refuses to take that responsibility itself, we are taking the company to court. In brief, we demand that Shell has zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and adapts its activities to be fully aligned with the climate goals in the Paris Agreement.
-
News / 10 November 2017
Delivering Money Where It Matters: Both ENDS' co-organised side event in Bonn
Both ENDS' Niels Hazekamp and Daan Robben are joining the Climate CoP in Bonn to actively follow the negotiations, with a special focus on certain topics such as subsidies and support for fossil fuels, climate finance, climate adaptation, and gender. Both ENDS also co-organises a side event together with the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
-
News / 28 August 2017
Politicians ask for sustainable export support
Last June, Both ENDS published a report which showed clearly that, through export credit insurance provider Atradius Dutch State Business (ADSB), the Netherlands is supporting the fossil fuel sector on a large scale. Between 2012 and 2015, ADSB provided billions of euros in insurance and guarantees, on behalf of the State of the Netherlands, to fossil-related export projects. This support is completely out of line with the Paris Climate Agreement. On 20 June, members of parliament Lammert van Raan (PvdD) and Sandra Beckerman (SP) submitted questions to the State Secretaries for Finance and for Infrastructure and the Environment.
-
Press release / 9 May 2018
ABP promises to go green but sticks with fossil fuels
New research by Both ENDS, Fossielvrij NL and urgewald shows that, in 2017, pension fund ABP invested 500 million euros more in coal, oil and gas than in the previous year – a total of 10.9 billion euros. These investments in fossil fuels not only stand in sharp contrast to ABP's claim that it has achieved substantial successes in its climate policy, but are also in flagrant violation of the Paris climate agreement. Unlike international forerunners among pension funds, ABP continues unabated to invest in the fossil energy sector.
-
Press release / 5 April 2019
Press release: Friends of the Earth Netherlands submits legal summons in climate case against Shell
The Hague, April 5, 2019 - Today Friends of the Earth Netherlands will deliver a court summons to Shell to legally compel the company to cease its destruction of the climate, on behalf of more than 30,000 people from 70 countries. A 236 page complaint will be delivered to Shell's International Headquarters in the Hague this afternoon by Friends of the Earth Netherlands, ActionAid NL, Both ENDS, Fossielvrij NL, Greenpeace NL,Young Friends of the Earth NL, Waddenvereniging and a large group of co-plaintiffs.
-
Dossier
Export Credit Agencies: Who pays the price?
Both ENDS calls on the government only to provide export credit insurance to sustainable projects that cause no social and/or environmental damage in the countries where they take place.
-
External link / 31 May 2018
High time to phase out support for fossil fuel industries (Annual Report 2017)
In 2017 Both ENDS stepped up its efforts to stop the Dutch government from supporting the fossil fuel industry. Phasing out fossil fuels is key to achieving the goals set in the Paris Climate Agreement. To Both ENDS, there is another reason: fossil fuel-related projects often have disastrous effects for the poorest people in the Global South.
-
Publication / 25 December 2015
-
Publication / 14 May 2017
-
Publication / 9 May 2018
-
Publication / 9 May 2018
-
Publication / 14 May 2017
-
News / 30 November 2016
Dutch Export Credit Agency did not prevent damaging practices in Suape
Atradius Dutch State Business (Atradius DSB) remains responsible for observing social, environmental and human rights, also after providing export credit insurance. That is the conclusion of the Dutch National Contact Point (NCP) for the OECD Guidelines in its final statement, which was published today. Both ENDS issued a press release about this.
