Criticism of Dutch pension fund ABP’s investments in coal, oil and gas
The Dutch pension fund, ABP, invested about two billion euros more in the fossil energy industry at the end of 2016 than the year before. This is announced by the report "Dirty & Dangerous: the fossil fuel investments of Dutch pension fund ABP," published today by Both ENDS, German urgewald and Fossielvrij NL. The report criticizes these investments because of the impact on the climate and the catastrophic consequences for the people in the areas where coal, oil and gas are being produced.
ABP's total investment in coal, the most risky and climate-disrupting polluter, was 4.3 billion euros in December 2016. That is 18% more than a year earlier. "This is in stark contrast to the intention to be a fully sustainable pension fund by 2020, as ABP announced last year," says Both ENDS' Cindy Coltman. "In order to achieve that, ABP should start by selling off all investments in coal, but the opposite has happened."
A large number of coal companies in which ABP invests plan to expand capacity. "Altogether it adds to more than 239,000 megawatts, almost five times as much as Russia now owns, and more than fifty times the coal capacity of the Netherlands," said Heffa Schucking of urgewald. "Of course, in the light of the Climate Agreement of Paris, this is unacceptable."
Oil and gas
Investments in oil and gas companies increased by 23% last year, to 6.9 billion euros in December 2016. Of significant note are ExxonMobil (832 million euros) and Shell (472 million euros).
Liset Meddens of Fossielvrij NL: "It is unacceptable for these companies to continue to explore and dig for new reserves when we know that if we use up all the reserves from the oil and gas fields that are currently operational, the temperature on Earth would already rise more than 2 degrees Celsius."
In addition to the impact of coal, oil and gas on the climate, their exploration and production has too often disastrous consequences for people and the environment in which they live.
In Indonesia, for example, ABP invests in the three companies behind the construction of the Batang Power Plant, the largest coal power plant in Indonesia. Protesting residents are intimidated and threatened by these companies, under the supervision of the local police. However, ABP has expanded its investments in these companies between June and December 2016.
ABP also has an investment of 379 million euros in three of Colombia's largest coal mining companies: BHP Billiton, Glencore and Anglo American. Colombia's coal mining is accompanied by gross violence against the locals, displacement from homes, disappearances and murders.
"The examples from our report show pensioners at ABP the local impact of the projects in which their pension funds are invested," says Coltman of Both ENDS.
Increase ambition level
Heffa Shucking: "Our report can be considered as a shadow report of the Sustainable and Responsible Report 2016, published by ABP itself on Monday, 8 May 2017. ABP has good intentions, but at present it is not clear under what conditions and within which period ABP will withdraw its fossil fuel investments. We want to encourage ABP to sharpen the ambitions of its investment policy. "
"ABP does not seem to realize that just by continuing to invest in the fossil fuel sector, this sector is being further stimulated," says Meddens of Fossielvrij NL. "It's not just about coal, oil and gas extraction, but also for the entire infrastructure around it. Ports, pipelines, power stations, roads, the whole circus must be uprooted for an energy transition that we have internationally agreed we want to get there as soon as possible!"
The authors of the report therefore call on ABP to provide much more openness about their investments in the fossil fuel sector, reduce all investments in coal by the end of 2017 and over the next five years reduce their investments in oil and gas to zero.
Information for the press (not for publication)
Contact person in Germany:
• Heffa Schucking (urgewald): firstname.lastname@example.org / +49 16096761436
For more information
Read more about this subject
Pension funds have a lot of influence because of their enormous assets. Both ENDS therefore wants pension funds such as the Dutch ABP to withdraw their investments from the fossil industry and to invest sustainably instead.
News / 1 May 2019
Amsterdam 1 May 2019 - Dutch pension fund ABP's 'sustainable and responsible investment report’ today suggests that the pension fund is well on track in terms attaining its internal sustainability goals. However, an analysis by Fossielvrij NL, Both ENDS, urgewald and Greenpeace shows that ABP remains on a collision course with the Paris climate goals. At the end of 2018, ABP still invested 16.5 billion Euros in the fossil industry. ABP's investments in the world's 44 largest climate polluters even increased between 2016 and 2018.
Press release / 9 May 2018
New research by Both ENDS, Fossielvrij NL and urgewald shows that, in 2017, pension fund ABP invested 500 million euros more in coal, oil and gas than in the previous year – a total of 10.9 billion euros. These investments in fossil fuels not only stand in sharp contrast to ABP's claim that it has achieved substantial successes in its climate policy, but are also in flagrant violation of the Paris climate agreement. Unlike international forerunners among pension funds, ABP continues unabated to invest in the fossil energy sector.
Event / 19 June 2022, 12:30
Still, more funds are spent on the fossil industry than on sustainable solutions. Banks, pension funds, insurers and governments keep investing in fossil infrastructure which endangers people and the environment. Therefore we call on financial institutions to stop funding the climate crisis.
Join our "Stop Fossil Finance" block at the next climate march!
Publication / 14 May 2017
Publication / 9 May 2018
Publication / 9 May 2018
Publication / 14 May 2017
Despite the existence of many hydropower dams, foreign investments and large government spending on energy, and new plans for hydropower, oil and gas projects, the vast majority of rural Uganda still remains without electricity. Together with our local partners we are striving towards a sustainable energy strategy for Uganda that starts from the needs and wishes of local communities.
Publication / 24 October 2019
Press release / 22 June 2020
Amsterdam, Copenhagen 22 June 2020 – In these times of increasing climate crisis, corporate social responsibility also means that investments in fossil gas must be phased out as quickly as possible. In a world in which a maximum temperature rise of 1.5 Celsius is the norm, fossil gas cannot be a 'transition fuel' towards sustainable energy. This is the message from five European environmental organisations (Both ENDS, the Danish AnsvarligFremtid, Fossil Free Sweden, Fossil Free Berlin and the Italian Re:Common) to pension funds in their countries that still invest in fossil gas companies. They are promoting that message with a new campaign called "Gas Free Pensions", which is being launched today.
Press release / 24 October 2019
Press release 24 October 2019
Starting today, investors can use five criteria to test whether companies in the fossil sector are actively working on phasing out their fossil activities. Too many investors still seem hesitant to switch to a profitable future of sustainable energy and these criteria should help them do this. The organisations DivestInvest Network, Sustainable Energy (Denmark) and Both ENDS (the Netherlands) publish the report "Managed Decline of Fossil Fuel Businesses" today, which describes these five criteria. The criteria aim to help investors choose investments that are in line with the Paris goal "stay below 1.5 degrees Celsius warming." The recommendations are presented at the World Pension Summit deliberately, because pension fund investors in particular can take more responsibility in this.
Press release / 3 February 2020
Amsterdam, 3 February 2020 - A step forward, but oil and gas remain a blind spot in Dutch pension fund ABP's new investment policy published today. That's what environmental organisations Both ENDS, Fossielvrij NL, Greenpeace Netherlands and urgewald say in response to the new climate policy of the EU's largest pension fund, with assets over 442 billion euros. Although ABP is taking first steps to invest sustainably, more is needed to stop the climate crisis.
News / 2 February 2020
The world has to stop using fossil fuels, but investment in the sector continues unabated. Investors of all kinds, including banks, insurance companies and pension funds, are hesitant about making the change to sustainable energy and are not sure where to start. In the autumn of 2019, together with the DivestInvest Network and Sustainable Energy (Denmark), Both ENDS published a report entitled ‘Managed Decline of Fossil Fuel Businesses’. The report describes five criteria to test whether companies in the fossil sector are actively taking steps to wind down their fossil activities. The criteria are helping investors to choose investments that are in line with the Paris goal of restricting global warming to a maximum of 1.5 degrees Celsius. We spoke to Lars Jensen, Senior Analyst at Sustainable Energy and lead author of the report.
Press release / 6 May 2020
The value of ABP's pension fund investments in fossil fuel companies has fallen by 44% from end of last year to its lowest point on March 16 this year, while the value of the rest of the portfolio decreased by 26%. This impact can be seen in simulations based on the publicly available equity portfolios of Dutch pension funds ABP and Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), carried out by research agency Profundo on behalf of Both ENDS. The simulations show that the risks of investing in the fossil fuel sector are increasing.
Press release / 23 September 2019
Amsterdam, 23 September 2019 - The world's 5th largest pension fund, with assets of over €430 billion, Dutch ABP is continuing to invest in companies that are on a collision course with the Paris climate goals, such as coal and oil companies.
Blog / 27 May 2022
and Abigail Kyomuhendo*
This week the annual shareholder meeting (AGM) of TotalEnergies took place. Whilst the shareholders celebrated their profits, Ugandan people were being evicted from their lands, thousands of kilometers away, for Total's East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP).
Publication / 23 September 2019
Press release / 27 September 2017
Despite climate agreements, the Netherlands supports the fossil sector with 7.6 billion euros a year
Although outgoing economics minister Henk Kamp stated in May of this year that fossil fuels are not subsidised in the Netherlands, a report out today shows that this is clearly not the case. The report. ‘Phase-Out 2020: Monitoring Europe’s fossil fuel subsidies’, by the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and Climate Action Network Europe (CAN-Europe), says that the Netherlands is supporting the fossil sector at home and abroad with more than 7.6 billion euros a year (1). The Netherlands made international agreements as long ago as 2009 (2) to ban subsidies for fossil fuels. Environment NGO Milieudefensie and Both ENDS – both members of CAN-Europe – call attention to these findings because they find it unacceptable that the government perpetuates our dependence on fossil fuels in this way.
Press release / 8 July 2021
Civil society organisations send urgent letter on climate to financial sector
Amsterdam, 8 July 2021 – The Shell ruling has consequences for the financiers of major climate polluters. That is the message in a letter from a number of civil society organisations, including Oxfam Novib, Eerlijke Geldwijzer, Milieudefensie, Greenpeace and Both ENDS, to the biggest banks, pension funds and insurance companies in the Netherlands. In the letter, they call on the financial institutions to reduce CO2 emissions from loans and investments in line with the 1.5 degrees goal laid down in the Paris climate agreement.