Opinion: ‘The Netherlands, use your influence to protect forests worldwide’
Recently, Dutch media covered the publication of a new report, issued by WWF, stating the big role the Netherlands still has in global deforestation, mainly due to our soy and palm oil imports. To counter this alarming message, Paul Wolvekamp and Tamara Mohr wrote an op-ed about the possibilities the Netherlands has to change the tide, which was published in Dutch on the website Joop.nl. Below, you find the English translation.
Opinion: 'The Netherlands, use your influence to protect forests worldwide'
A recent report by the WWF showed that the Netherlands still plays a significant role in global deforestation. We are one of the largest importers of soy in Europe, and the largest of palm oil. That's the bad news. The good news is that, as a large-scale importer of these products, the Netherlands is in a good position to contribute to a solution. We have a number of suggestions for how the Netherlands can turn the tide.
Firstly, the Netherlands can stop cooperating on the construction of infrastructure that facilitates the transport of products linked to deforestation. Our embassies are very keen to sing the praises of Dutch companies with the knowledge to help out with these projects, so that they are awarded contracts to implement them. This happened, for example, with the plans for the Brazilian soy corridor, a mega infrastructure project to carry soy quickly from the hinterland to the seaports, from where it can be exported to the Netherlands, other European nations and elsewhere.
Instead of supporting these projects, the Netherlands could promote our knowledge of sustainable agriculture and food systems – Wageningen University has a good international reputation in this area – so that, rather than feeding our cows, chickens and pigs, the exporting countries can provide their own population with healthy, sustainable and locally grown food.
Secondly, it is time for binding legislation and environmental and human rights standards that production chains have to comply with. The production of soy, palm oil and other products not only destroys ecosystems but also drives local farmers and indigenous people from their lands.
Until now, the Netherlands has preferred to rely on voluntary covenants with the private sector and refer to the EU for binding rules. These covenants have, however, so far led to little or no improvement.
The European Commission is currently working on new legislation to combat 'imported deforestation' – deforestation caused by products that we import – worldwide. As a large-scale importer, the Netherlands is well placed to play a leading role in Europe in this respect rather than adopting a 'wait-and-see' attitude. By approving the proposed legislation on chain responsibility now under consideration by parliament, the Netherlands can set a good example and make a credible case for genuinely robust legislation in Europe.
Finally, this report by the WWF is the latest in a series of wake-up calls that something needs to change urgently within the agrarian sector in the Netherlands. The livestock population needs to be reduced, with better prices and prospects for farmers, so that we can address our international footprint, farmers' incomes and the domestic nitrogen problem at the same time. Food production needs to be more sustainable and the efforts of outgoing agriculture minister Carola Schouten to promote circular and nature-inclusive agriculture now finally deserve broad support. The counter-argument that we in the Netherlands feed the world with our efficient food production is a fallacy because, at the same time, the word is feeding the Dutch livestock population.
Let us ensure that the world can feed itself in a way that protects our planet, the climate and the living environment of billions of people. We need not be afraid of falling out of line internationally. With these concrete actions, a new government can show the world that the Netherlands is genuinely an innovative international actor in the agrarian sector and is seriously pursuing compliance with the international climate agreements.
Tamara Mohr and Paul Wolvekamp are policy officers at environmental and human rights organisation Both ENDS
For more information
Read more about this subject
-
Dossier
Fighting for improvements in the production of palm oil
The production of palm oil is causing social and environmental problems worldwide. Both ENDS is working to make the sector fairer and more sustainable and is promoting alternatives for palm oil.
-
Dossier
Soy: trade in deforestation
The rising demand for soy is having negative consequences for people and the environment in South America. Both ENDS reminds Dutch actors in the soy industry of their responsibilities and is working with partners on fair and sustainable alternatives.
-
Publication / 23 May 2023
-
Press release / 23 May 2023
60th anniversary of Dutch bilateral investment treaties no cause for celebration
On 23 May, the Netherlands celebrates 60 years of bilateral investment treaties (BITs). The first BIT was signed with Tunisia in 1963. These treaties were intended to make an important contribution to protecting foreign investments by Dutch companies. A study by SOMO, Both ENDS and the Transnational Institute (TNI), however, shows that in practice they mainly give multinationals a powerful instrument that has far-reaching consequences people and the environment worldwide.
-
Letter / 4 May 2023
Letter from NGOs to Dutch export credit agency: CSR policy must be strengthened
The Dutch government, through its export credit agency Atradius DSB (ADSB), provides export support to companies that undertake activities abroad. The state wants projects it insures to have no negative consequences for people and the environment and therefore sets requirements for corporate social responsibility (CSR). A consultation on CSR policy ran until the end of April, to which a coalition of thirteen social organisations from the Netherlands and abroad, including Both ENDS and Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth the Netherlands), responded.
-
News / 4 May 2023
18 reasons for a Dutch agricultural policy with an international perspective
Our manifesto "The Dutch Agriculture Agreement reaches further than the Netherlands: offer prospects for sustainable farmers and consumers worldwide" has now been signed by over 70 civil society organisations, agricultural organisations and companies, environmental organisations and scientists from around the world. Below, a few of them give their personal motivation why they support the manifesto.
-
Publication / 24 April 2023
-
Press release / 21 April 2023
Manifesto: The Netherlands can reduce its international footprint with new Agricultural Agreement
The Dutch Agriculture Agreement, which is currently under development, is too much focused solely on the Netherlands. That is the opinion of a broad coalition of more than sixty NGOs, farmers' organisations, scientists and companies that have today sent an urgent letter to agriculture minister Piet Adema and foreign trade and development minister Liesje Schreinemacher. The government's agricultural policy should also aim to reduce the Netherlands' enormous agrarian footprint beyond our borders, by taking food security and the preservation of biodiversity as its starting points. The coalition has published a manifesto in which it sets out how reform of the Netherlands' foreign agricultural policy could be given shape.
-
Letter / 22 March 2023
Suggestions to the CRM Act appreciations for the Dutch government
While the energy transition via renewable energy, such as solar and wind energy, is fundamental to reduce EU CO2 emissions, we are concerned with the impacts it will have on the (geo-political) economy, people and environment. Our collaboration with civil society organisations in the Global South over the past 30 years has shown us that the patterns of consumption by rich countries, such as the Netherlands and the EU in general, have a devastating impact on people and the environment in mainly Africa, South-America and South-East Asia.
-
Publication / 21 March 2023
-
Publication / 15 March 2023
-
Publication / 9 March 2023
-
Letter / 28 February 2023
175 CSOs call on world leaders to end OECD export finance for oil and gas
This joint position launched by 175 civil society organisations from 45 countries calls on world leaders to end OECD export finance for oil and gas, and explains how it can be done.
-
News / 20 February 2023
Almost 60 organisations send a letter about fossil export support to Dutch Parliament
Today, a letter, undersigned by almost 60 organisations from countries that face the consequences of fossil fuel projects or stand in solidarity, has been sent to the Dutch Members of Parliament. This Thursday, a debate about the export credit facility and the policies around it, will take place in the Dutch Parliament. The coalition calls upon Dutch politicians and policy makers to stand up against any form of export support for fossil fuel projects that are to be executed by Dutch companies abroad, expecially in the global South.
-
Letter / 20 February 2023
Letter of international CSO's to Dutch Parliament: close gaps in Dutch policy on limiting public finance to fossil fuels
In October 2022, the Dutch government published a policy to implement the COP26 statement in which it promised to stop public finance for fossil fuel projects abroad by the end of 2022 . The proposed policy, unfortunately, has quite some 'loopholes' that make it possible for the Dutch government to keep supporting large fossil projects abroad for at least another year. These projects often run for years and will have a negative impact on the countries where they take place for decades to come.
-
Letter / 15 December 2022
No export credit support for Santos FPSO
In October this year, the Dutch government published a policy to implement the COP26 statement in which it promised to stop public finance for fossil fuel projects abroad by the end of 2022 . In spite of this pledge, the Netherlands is considering granting an export credit insurance to a floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel that will be used to produce oil and fossil gas in Brazil for a period of 30 years.
-
Transformative Practice
Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs)
About one in every six people, particularly women, directly rely on forests for their lives and livelihoods, especially for food. This shows how important non-timber forest products (NTFPs) and forests are to ensure community resilience. Not only as a source of food, water and income, but also because of their cultural and spiritual meaning.
-
Publication / 14 December 2022
-
Press release / 5 December 2022
Groups react with dismay to FMO’s position statement on Financial Intermediaries, pointing to outstanding human rights and climate concerns
On October 13th 2022, FMO published the final version of its Position Statement on Impact and ESG for Financial Intermediaries (FI statement). As civil society groups which have engaged with FMO on this topic for more than four years, we are extremely disappointed with the result. In the statement, FMO does not show sufficient commitment to ensuring its investments into financial intermediaries – which represent the bank's largest investment sector* – do not violate human rights or contribute to environmental harms.
-
News / 10 November 2022
African women raise their voice ahead of COP27 and call for climate justice
In October 2022, 150 women from 14 African Countries gathered in Port Harcourt, Nigeria for the first African Women's Climate Assembly. The aim of this Assembly was to strengthen and unify women-led struggles against dirty extractives and false solutions to the climate crisis in West and Central Africa, and propose the real development solutions that support women's interests in a good and decent life and livelihoods in a time of climate crisis.