Website names companies excluded by global investors and banks
The Hague/San Francisco, Dec 12, 2024 - The updated version of the Financial Exclusions Tracker is released today: financialexclusionstracker.org. The website tracks which companies are being excluded by institutional investors, pension funds and banks due to human rights, public health and sustainability issues. The most common reasons for exclusion are links to fossil fuels, weapons or tobacco.
The Financial Exclusions Tracker is an initiative from an international coalition of NGOs striving for more transparency and information disclosure.
This public dataset gathers information from multiple sources, consolidating it in one accessible location so that investors, banks, civil society and the media are easily informed about which corporations have been excluded and the underlying reasons for the exclusion. The tracker lists a total of 5,534 company groups (66,708 exclusions) from 135 countries that have been excluded by 93 financial institutions in 17 countries. Providing an updated overview of financial exclusions, since the first launch in October 2023, this second version of the Tracker, includes even more investors and companies. In a novel addition, it also features sector exclusions.
The coalition expects this list to increase pressure on the identified companies to improve their business practices. It is also hoped that the tool will increase transparency amongst investors and banks and encourage them to publicly share their exclusion policies. Civil society, investors, and governments can use the database to identify the companies with the largest Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) risks, as flagged by financial institutions themselves.
Climate is the most cited reason for exclusion of companies
The most common motivation for excluding companies is climate/fossil fuels (48%) This is followed by weapons (15%), tobacco (13%), country policy (e.g. exclusion of Russian companies) (6%), product-based exclusions (e.g. alcohol, gambling) (5%) human rights (4%) and business practices (e.g. corruption) (3%).
The companies most commonly excluded by investors and banks as per reason for exclusion motive, are:
- Climate (almost exclusively fossil fuels): Exxaro Resources, China Energy, Shandong Energy Group, Banpu, State Power Investment Corporation (SPIC)
- Weapons (cluster munitions, anti-personnel mines, nuclear weapons): Poongsan, Lig Nex 1, Larsen & Toubro, Lockheed Martin, Anhui Military Industry
- Tobacco: Altria Group, Philip Morris International, British American Tobacco (BAT), Imperial Brands, Japan Tobacco (JT)
- Human rights violations and risks: Vale, Energy Transfer, Elbit Systems, Walmart, OCP Group
- Business practices (e.g. controversial behaviour and corruption): Vale, JBS, China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Company), Zijin Mining
- Country policy: Sberbank, VTB Bank, Russian Agricultural Bank, Gazprom, Russian Railways
- Environment (e.g. deforestation, destruction of biodiversity): Freeport-McMoRan, Barrick Gold Corp, Zijin Mining, Norilsk Nickel (Nornickel), Jardine Matheson Group
- Product-based exclusion (e.g. alcohol, gambling, palm oil): Genting Group, VICI Properties, Flutter Entertainment, MGM Resorts International.
The top 5 countries with the most excluded companies are (1) USA 1,160, (2) China 852, (3) India 341, (4) Canada 290, and (5) Russia 283.
Fossil fuel companies do not only feature prominently in the climate category, but also in the categories related to human rights violations and controversial business practices.
The original motivation for excluding each company can be found on the Financial Exclusions Tracker website, provided the financial institution has disclosed the reason for the exclusion . The data are searchable by company, investor, country of the investor, country of the company, exclusion category and subcategory. This data will be updated on a yearly basis, to reflect the regular changes in these financial exclusion lists.
Financial Exclusions Tracker is an initiative by:
BankTrack, Both ENDS, Fair Finance International, Forests & Finance, Health Funds for a Smokefree Netherlands, Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands), PAX, Profundo Research Foundation, Rainforest Action Network, the Environmental Paper Network, and OneBigRobot.
For more information:
Forests & Finance <forestsandfinance@ran.org>, Merel van de Mark: merel@ran.org
Fair Finance International, Kees Kodde: +31 6 5362 3818
Profundo, Ward Warmerdam: w.warmerdam@profundo.nl
Quotes
“This dataset shows for example that palm oil producers like Genting Group and Jardine Matheson and meatpacker JBS, have been excluded by dozens of financial institutions over environmental concerns. This should be a red flag for anyone considering doing business with these companies.” Merel van der Mark, coordinator of the Forests and Finance Coalition.
“We welcome the fact that several financial institutions exclude companies due to the links with detrimental climate, human rights and biodiversity impacts. We urgently need regulation at European level that prohibits deforestation finance. If we do not stop harmful finance, we will not meet any global climate or biodiversity goals. Currently the European Commission is reviewing the role of the financial sector in the framework of the EU anti-deforestation regulation, and we need to see an ambitious proposal for regulation in June 2025." Danielle van Oijen, Forest Program coordinator Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands).
“This database is a very valuable source of information for the financial sector, media, business and civil society. Extra due diligence is required for companies who appear in this database. We hope that the companies mentioned will clean up their act.” Kees Kodde, project lead Fair Finance International.
“Annually, the tobacco industry is responsible for more than 8 million deaths worldwide and has a reputation for deception and deceit. It is an industry in which one should not want to invest. This database will hopefully inspire other parties,” Hans Snijder, director of the Health Funds for a Smokefree Netherlands.
“Public exclusion is a very important way for investors to exercise influence when companies do not listen to their sustainability demands. This tool helps to amplify investor positions and increases the pressure on companies to act.” Jakob König, leader of Fair Finance Guide in Sweden.
"This new database will empower our advocacy with investors, and it allows us to better help people affected by the negligent behavior of companies violating human and environmental rights." Ana Xambre Pereira, International Flow Advocacy Officer at Both ENDS (the Netherlands).
“Banks and other investors are well advised to carefully consult this new Exclusion Tracker as part of their overall due diligence procedures on new and existing clients, as these exclusions by other financial institutions result from similar vetting procedures that have brought to light aspects of those companies’ performance deemed unacceptable by them. Such exclusion decisions by peers may well be a good reason for a bank to once more assess the risk of the client relationship, or even follow their example.” Johan Frijns, Executive Director of BankTrack (Netherlands).
For more information
Read more about this subject
-
Dossier /Seeking justice for the affected communities of Vale’s mining disasters in Mariana and Brumadinho
In 2015 and 2019, the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais experienced two severe mining tragedies in Mariana and Brumadinho, due to the same mining company: Vale. Since then, the affected communities have been seeking justice, via the criminal punishment of the responsible parties, and a fair compensation for the loss of their loved ones, their homes and their livelihoods. Both ENDS supports local CSOs by amplifying their quest for justice within an international audience and, more specifically, by raising awareness amongst Dutch investors in Vale about the high risks this company’s activities pose for people and the environment.
-
Dossier /Making pension funds more sustainable
Pension funds have a lot of influence because of their enormous assets. Both ENDS therefore wants pension funds such as the Dutch ABP to withdraw their investments from the fossil industry and to invest sustainably instead.
-
News / 27 October 2026Both ENDS at COP31: Locally led climate finance and ending investment rules that block climate action
At COP31, Both ENDS advocates for climate finance that reaches women-led and community-based organisations at the forefront of climate action, while challenging the economic rules that obstruct the transition away from fossil fuels. Together with partners in the Global Alliance for Green and Gender Action (GAGGA) and the PAPeS programme, we push for locally led adaptation, gender-just climate action and greater accountability for governments and companies.
We asked our colleagues Daan Robben and Fernando Hernandez why they are going to COP31, what messages they want to bring to negotiators, and what a positive outcome would look like.
-
News / 25 October 2026Meet Sarah Adongo: “The soil remembers those who cry and defend it”
By Sarah Adongo, Lawyer, Witness Radio, Uganda
Sarah Adongo is one of the three winners of the 2026 Irene Dankelman Young Ecofeminist Award, presented on 21 October at the UN Biodiversity Conference (CBD COP17) in Yerevan, Armenia. A lawyer working with Witness Radio Uganda, Sarah works with women affected by gender-based violence and communities affected by land dispossession and large-scale investments. In this piece, she shares what the award means to her and why gender and environmental justice must go hand in hand.
-
Dossier /The JWH Initiative: supporting young environmental leaders
The JWH Initiative aims to stimulate leadership of young people in environmental organisations by giving small grants to individuals to expand their knowledge, experience and training.
-
News / 25 October 2026Meet Yemi Knight: “Your experience is expertise”
By Yemi Knight (they/them), Founder and Executive Director, AnchorBridge Environmental Inc., Barbados
Yemi Knight is one of the three winners of the 2026 Irene Dankelman Young Ecofeminist Award, presented on 21 October at the UN Biodiversity Conference (CBD COP17) in Yerevan, Armenia. Yemi founded AnchorBridge Environmental, a youth-led organisation that combines policy advocacy with climate education across the Caribbean. We asked them what the award means to them, what they are working on, and what they would tell other young ecofeminist leaders.
Yemi is also part of the network of the Joke Waller-Hunter Initiative, powered by Both ENDS. With a JWH grant, Yemi followed courses in Social, Environmental and Economic Impact Assessment and in Risk, Crisis and Disaster Management at the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campusc, as well as a Level 1A Spanish course at the Centre for Language Learning at the university’s St. Augustine Campus.
-
Dossier /International trade and investment with respect for people and planet
The network of international trade and investment treaties is large and complex. The Netherlands alone has signed more than 70 bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and is party to the trade and investment agreements concluded by the EU, like the EU-Mercosur and EU-Indonesia trade deals.
-
Dossier /Rights for People, Rules for Corporations – Stop ISDS!
Indigenous communities in Paraguay saw their attempts to regain their ancestral lands thwarted by German investors. In Indonesia, US-based mining companies succeeded to roll back new laws that were meant to boost the country’s economic development and protect its forests. This is the level of impact that investment treaties can have on social, environmental and economic development and rights. Why? Because of the ‘Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement’ clauses that are included in many such treaties.
-
Press release / 15 October 2026Dutch and Portuguese organisations file EU complaint over investment treaties that let companies and sanctioned Russian oligarchs sue EU countries for compensation
The Netherlands and Portugal join four other EU countries facing such a complaint, as the Global Days of Action against Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) begin.
-
Dossier /Dare to Trust: the power of unconditional funding
At Both ENDS we cherish our long-term relationships with partners in our global network. These relationships are based on equality and built on trust. The trust we have in each other has developed from years of strategic cooperation, including joint advocacy around common agendas, knowledge sharing, networking, and mobilising and sharing resources to advance environmental justice.
-
Dossier /Global Alliance for Green and Gender Action (GAGGA)
GAGGA rallies the collective power of the women's rights and environmental justice movements to realize a world where women can and do access their rights to water, food security, and a clean, healthy and safe environment.
-
News / 29 September 2026Summary - Both ENDS complaint under the EU-New Zealand trade agreement
On 29 September 2026, Both ENDS lodged the first complaint on climate grounds with the European Commission's Single Entry Point. It asks the Commission to examine whether Aotearoa New Zealand has broken two promises both sides made in the EU-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement: not to weaken or set aside environmental laws in order to encourage trade or investment, and to effectively implement the Paris Agreement.
-
Publication / 29 September 2026
-
Publication / 29 September 2026
-
News / 29 September 2026Q&A: New Zealand's climate rollback and the EU trade agreement
On 29 September 2026 / 30 September in Aotearoa New Zealand, Both ENDS lodged a complaint with the European Commission under the EU-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement. These are the questions we are asked most often, and our answers. The complaint summary, the case explainer and the key public sources are linked at the end of this page.
-
News / 29 September 2026What happens now? A timeline of the SEP Case
What happens now? On 29 September 2026 / 30 September in Aotearoa New Zealand, Both ENDS lodged a formal complaint with the European Commission. It is the first complaint to the EU's Single Entry Point on environmental and climate grounds. It asks the Commission to hold New Zealand to two promises it made in its trade agreement with the EU: not to weaken environmental protection to encourage trade or investment, and not to undermine the Paris Agreement on climate change.
-
Press release / 29 September 2026New Zealand faces its first climate complaint under EU trade rules
UTRECHT / WELLINGTON, 29 September 2026 /30 September in Aotearoa New Zealand
Both ENDS, a Dutch environmental justice organisation, has lodged a formal complaint with the European Commission arguing that New Zealand has broken the climate promises it made in its free trade agreement with the European Union. It is the first complaint on environmental and climate grounds under the Commission's Single Entry Point, the mechanism that lets civil society ask the EU to enforce the sustainability commitments in its trade agreements.
-
News / 7 September 2026Unprecedented criminal conviction in the Mariana disaster case breaks mining industry's cycle of impunity
A Brazilian federal court has, for the first time, criminally convicted a mining company and three of its managers for their role in the 2015 collapse of the Fundão dam, one of the worst environmental disasters in Brazil's history. Our partner Instituto Cordilheira, which represented victims as assistant prosecutors in the case, calls it a historic breakthrough after years of impunity.
-
News / 3 September 2026Restoring Land, Restoring Hope: Both ENDS at UNCCD COP17 in Mongolia
From 17 to 28 August, governments gathered in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, for COP17 of the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). At stake was more than how the world responds to land degradation and drought. It was also a question of who gets to shape land restoration, whose knowledge counts, and where the money goes.
-
Letter / 14 July 2026
Statement on CAO Cambodia Microfinance Case
The independent complaints mechanism of the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and the World Bank Group found that the IFC violated its own Environmental and Social Sustainability Framework by investing in six banks providing microfinance in Cambodia.
