Website names companies excluded by global investors and banks
The Hague/San Francisco, Dec 12, 2024 - The updated version of the Financial Exclusions Tracker is released today: financialexclusionstracker.org. The website tracks which companies are being excluded by institutional investors, pension funds and banks due to human rights, public health and sustainability issues. The most common reasons for exclusion are links to fossil fuels, weapons or tobacco.
The Financial Exclusions Tracker is an initiative from an international coalition of NGOs striving for more transparency and information disclosure.
This public dataset gathers information from multiple sources, consolidating it in one accessible location so that investors, banks, civil society and the media are easily informed about which corporations have been excluded and the underlying reasons for the exclusion. The tracker lists a total of 5,534 company groups (66,708 exclusions) from 135 countries that have been excluded by 93 financial institutions in 17 countries. Providing an updated overview of financial exclusions, since the first launch in October 2023, this second version of the Tracker, includes even more investors and companies. In a novel addition, it also features sector exclusions.
The coalition expects this list to increase pressure on the identified companies to improve their business practices. It is also hoped that the tool will increase transparency amongst investors and banks and encourage them to publicly share their exclusion policies. Civil society, investors, and governments can use the database to identify the companies with the largest Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) risks, as flagged by financial institutions themselves.
Climate is the most cited reason for exclusion of companies
The most common motivation for excluding companies is climate/fossil fuels (48%) This is followed by weapons (15%), tobacco (13%), country policy (e.g. exclusion of Russian companies) (6%), product-based exclusions (e.g. alcohol, gambling) (5%) human rights (4%) and business practices (e.g. corruption) (3%).
The companies most commonly excluded by investors and banks as per reason for exclusion motive, are:
- Climate (almost exclusively fossil fuels): Exxaro Resources, China Energy, Shandong Energy Group, Banpu, State Power Investment Corporation (SPIC)
- Weapons (cluster munitions, anti-personnel mines, nuclear weapons): Poongsan, Lig Nex 1, Larsen & Toubro, Lockheed Martin, Anhui Military Industry
- Tobacco: Altria Group, Philip Morris International, British American Tobacco (BAT), Imperial Brands, Japan Tobacco (JT)
- Human rights violations and risks: Vale, Energy Transfer, Elbit Systems, Walmart, OCP Group
- Business practices (e.g. controversial behaviour and corruption): Vale, JBS, China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Company), Zijin Mining
- Country policy: Sberbank, VTB Bank, Russian Agricultural Bank, Gazprom, Russian Railways
- Environment (e.g. deforestation, destruction of biodiversity): Freeport-McMoRan, Barrick Gold Corp, Zijin Mining, Norilsk Nickel (Nornickel), Jardine Matheson Group
- Product-based exclusion (e.g. alcohol, gambling, palm oil): Genting Group, VICI Properties, Flutter Entertainment, MGM Resorts International.
The top 5 countries with the most excluded companies are (1) USA 1,160, (2) China 852, (3) India 341, (4) Canada 290, and (5) Russia 283.
Fossil fuel companies do not only feature prominently in the climate category, but also in the categories related to human rights violations and controversial business practices.
The original motivation for excluding each company can be found on the Financial Exclusions Tracker website, provided the financial institution has disclosed the reason for the exclusion . The data are searchable by company, investor, country of the investor, country of the company, exclusion category and subcategory. This data will be updated on a yearly basis, to reflect the regular changes in these financial exclusion lists.
Financial Exclusions Tracker is an initiative by:
BankTrack, Both ENDS, Fair Finance International, Forests & Finance, Health Funds for a Smokefree Netherlands, Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands), PAX, Profundo Research Foundation, Rainforest Action Network, the Environmental Paper Network, and OneBigRobot.
For more information:
Forests & Finance <forestsandfinance@ran.org>, Merel van de Mark: merel@ran.org
Fair Finance International, Kees Kodde: +31 6 5362 3818
Profundo, Ward Warmerdam: w.warmerdam@profundo.nl
Quotes
“This dataset shows for example that palm oil producers like Genting Group and Jardine Matheson and meatpacker JBS, have been excluded by dozens of financial institutions over environmental concerns. This should be a red flag for anyone considering doing business with these companies.” Merel van der Mark, coordinator of the Forests and Finance Coalition.
“We welcome the fact that several financial institutions exclude companies due to the links with detrimental climate, human rights and biodiversity impacts. We urgently need regulation at European level that prohibits deforestation finance. If we do not stop harmful finance, we will not meet any global climate or biodiversity goals. Currently the European Commission is reviewing the role of the financial sector in the framework of the EU anti-deforestation regulation, and we need to see an ambitious proposal for regulation in June 2025." Danielle van Oijen, Forest Program coordinator Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands).
“This database is a very valuable source of information for the financial sector, media, business and civil society. Extra due diligence is required for companies who appear in this database. We hope that the companies mentioned will clean up their act.” Kees Kodde, project lead Fair Finance International.
“Annually, the tobacco industry is responsible for more than 8 million deaths worldwide and has a reputation for deception and deceit. It is an industry in which one should not want to invest. This database will hopefully inspire other parties,” Hans Snijder, director of the Health Funds for a Smokefree Netherlands.
“Public exclusion is a very important way for investors to exercise influence when companies do not listen to their sustainability demands. This tool helps to amplify investor positions and increases the pressure on companies to act.” Jakob König, leader of Fair Finance Guide in Sweden.
"This new database will empower our advocacy with investors, and it allows us to better help people affected by the negligent behavior of companies violating human and environmental rights." Ana Xambre Pereira, International Flow Advocacy Officer at Both ENDS (the Netherlands).
“Banks and other investors are well advised to carefully consult this new Exclusion Tracker as part of their overall due diligence procedures on new and existing clients, as these exclusions by other financial institutions result from similar vetting procedures that have brought to light aspects of those companies’ performance deemed unacceptable by them. Such exclusion decisions by peers may well be a good reason for a bank to once more assess the risk of the client relationship, or even follow their example.” Johan Frijns, Executive Director of BankTrack (Netherlands).
For more information
Read more about this subject
-
Dossier /Seeking justice for the affected communities of Vale’s mining disasters in Mariana and Brumadinho
In 2015 and 2019, the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais experienced two severe mining tragedies in Mariana and Brumadinho, due to the same mining company: Vale. Since then, the affected communities have been seeking justice, via the criminal punishment of the responsible parties, and a fair compensation for the loss of their loved ones, their homes and their livelihoods. Both ENDS supports local CSOs by amplifying their quest for justice within an international audience and, more specifically, by raising awareness amongst Dutch investors in Vale about the high risks this company’s activities pose for people and the environment.
-
Dossier /Making pension funds more sustainable
Pension funds have a lot of influence because of their enormous assets. Both ENDS therefore wants pension funds such as the Dutch ABP to withdraw their investments from the fossil industry and to invest sustainably instead.
-
Dossier /Gas in Mozambique
In 2011 one of the world’s largest gas reserves was found in the coastal province of Cabo Delgado, in the north of Mozambique. A total of 35 billion dollars has been invested to extract the gas. Dozens of multinationals and financiers are involved in these rapid developments. It is very difficult for the people living in Cabo Delgado to exert influence on the plans and activities, while they experience the negative consequences. With the arrival of these companies, they are losing their land.
-
Press release / 2 december 2025End of Dutch involvement in controversial gas project in Mozambique in sight after TotalEnergies withdraws from Dutch insurance
THE HAGUE/CABO DELGADO, December 1, 2025 - Today, Minister of Finance Eelco Heinen announced that TotalEnergies is withdrawing from a $640 million Dutch export credit insurance policy for a controversial gas project in Mozambique. Although the Dutch government has been avoiding this decision for years, this move has finally ended part of the Dutch involvement in this disastrous project.
-
Dossier /Indigenous communities threatened by Barro Blanco dam in Panama
The Barro Blanco dam project in Panama, which has Dutch financial support, is causing indigenous lands to disappear under water. Both ENDS is working to protect the rights of indigenous communities living near the dam.
-
Blog / 1 december 2025The Long Road to Justice for the Ngäbe of Kiad
In October 2025 I travelled to Kiad, the Indigenous Ngäbe community that led the struggle against the FMO-financed Barro Blanco dam, for one last time. I went there to say my goodbyes, both personally and on behalf of Both ENDS, and to catch a first glimpse on how a community program financed by FMO and DEG – the result of a dialogue process that took several years – is giving a new impulse to the dam-affected communities. But how did we get here?
-
Environmentally Just Practice /A Negotiated Approach for Inclusive Water Governance
A Negotiated Approach envisages the meaningful and long-term participation of communities in all aspects of managing the water and other natural resources on which their lives depend. It seeks to achieve healthy ecosystems and equitable sharing of benefits among all stakeholders within a river basin. This inclusive way of working is an essential precondition for the Transformative Practices that are promoted by Both ENDS and partners.
-
News / 27 november 2025Communities and International Consortium Present Community-Led Plan for Nature-Based Adaptation to Sea-Level Rise in Coastal Bangladesh
Local communities in the southwestern coastal region of Bangladesh—together with an international consortium including Uttaran, CEGIS, and Both ENDS—have presented a community-led plan to confront climate change and accelerating sea-level rise through nature-based adaptation. The People’s Plan for Upscaling Ecosystem-Based Adaptation outlines a scalable strategy rooted in local ownership and generations of lived experience. At its centre is Community-Based Tidal River Management (CBTRM), a proven approach that reduces waterlogging, raises land elevation, and restores ecological balance by working with natural tidal and sediment dynamics.
-
Dossier /Rights for People, Rules for Corporations – Stop ISDS!
Indigenous communities in Paraguay saw their attempts to regain their ancestral lands thwarted by German investors. In Indonesia, US-based mining companies succeeded to roll back new laws that were meant to boost the country’s economic development and protect its forests. This is the level of impact that investment treaties can have on social, environmental and economic development and rights. Why? Because of the ‘Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement’ clauses that are included in many such treaties.
-
Dossier /Wetlands without Borders
With our Wetlands without Borders program, we work towards environmentally sustainable and socially responsible governance of the wetlands system of the La Plata Basin in South America.
-
Publication / 17 november 2025
-
Environmentally Just Practice /Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs)
About one in every six people, particularly women, directly rely on forests for their lives and livelihoods, especially for food. This shows how important non-timber forest products (NTFPs) and forests are to ensure community resilience. Not only as a source of food, water and income, but also because of their cultural and spiritual meaning.
-
Letter / 14 november 2025
Letter: TPAC’s report “Final Judgement Detailed Research MTCS’’
A coalition of Malaysian and international NGOs has released a memorandum in response to the recent TPAC report on the Malaysian Timber Certification Scheme (MTCS). The organisations express serious concerns about the independence, quality, and credibility of the assessment carried out by the Timber Procurement Assessment Committee (TPAC).
-
Press release / 13 november 2025Global Alliance Urges Dutch Government to Reconsider Endorsement of Controversial Timber Certification Scheme
A coalition of Malaysian and international NGOs has released a memorandum in response to the recent TPAC report on the Malaysian Timber Certification Scheme (MTCS). The organizations express serious concerns about the independence, quality, and credibility of the assessment carried out by the Timber Procurement Assessment Committee (TPAC).
-
Dossier /Global Alliance for Green and Gender Action (GAGGA)
GAGGA rallies the collective power of the women's rights and environmental justice movements to realize a world where women can and do access their rights to water, food security, and a clean, healthy and safe environment.
-
News / 5 november 2025Interview: Both ENDS at COP30 for Climate Justice and Systemic Change
Both ENDS is present at COP30 to advocate for genuine access to climate finance for locally led, gender-just climate solutions and the mechanisms that facilitate this, including those for farmer-led restoration. Furthermore, the organisation participates to ensure the crucial connection between the climate negotiations and the trade and investment frameworks that shape them.
Learn more about the Both ENDS team at COP30 below, and find all the activities and side-events in which Both ENDS will participate.
-
News / 5 november 2025Overview of Both ENDS events at COP30 in Belem, Brazil
Both ENDS is present at COP30 to advocate for genuine access to climate finance for locally led, gender-just climate solutions, and for the mechanisms that make these possible, including those supporting farmer-led restoration. The organisation also engages to highlight the crucial connection between climate negotiations and the trade and investment frameworks that shape them.
Below is an overview of the Both ENDS team at COP30 and a detailed look at the activities and side-events in which Both ENDS will participate.
-
News / 27 oktober 2025New Step in FMO’s Complaint Policy – Civil Society Organizations Call for Further Strengthening
The updated complaint mechanism of the development banks FMO, DEG, and Proparco marks an important step forward. Organizations that participated in the consultation acknowledge the efforts to improve the mechanism. At the same time, they emphasize that much still needs to be done to make the policy truly effective, transparent, and independent.
-
Publication / 16 oktober 2025
-
Publication / 16 oktober 2025
