Both ENDS

En
Nl
Search
News / 2 November 2026

Our call to FMO: Put people and climate before Eni’s profits

The Dutch development bank FMO is considering a loan to help Eni natural Energie Congo1 to grow its biofuel business in Africa. Together with our partners, we have asked FMO not to go ahead, for three reasons: Eni is a highly profitable oil and gas company that does not need public development, its biofuel projects in Africa have harmed farmers and put pressure on food supplies, and it uses lawsuits to intimidate its critics.

On 9 October FMO, the Dutch development bank, published a plan to invest in Eni Natural Energies Congo SAU, a subsidiary2 of the fossil fuel giant Eni SpA. On 23 October Both ENDS, ReCommon (Italy) and JA! (Justica Ambiental, Mozambique) sent a letter to FMO asking it not to go ahead with this investment.

 

FMO proposes to join a loan of up to USD 150 million led by the IFC, the World Bank’s private-sector arm. FMO would lend part of that money alongside the IFC (as a so-called B-lender). The loan would help Eni expand the supply of crops it uses to make biofuels in Angola, the Republic of the Congo and Mozambique. According to FMO, the investment would support Eni’s plan to cut its carbon emissions.

Eni SpA is an Italian fossil fuel company. According to Urgewald, a German environmental research organisation, it ranks fourth worldwide for short-term expansion plans3, in other words, plans to develop new oil and gas fields in the coming years. Based on projections using 2025 figures, Eni could make a net profit of around 10 billion euros this year. This is not a company short of cash. Development finance - public money meant to support sustainable development in poorer countries - should not be spent helping a wealthy and profitable fossil fuel giant grow its business.

 

Biofuels are not automatically a climate solution and can harm f farmers and food supplies

Biofuels are fuels made from plants instead of oil, gas or coal. They are often presented as a greener alternative, but whether they really are depends on how and where the crops are grown – and on what else the company is doing. Supporting biofuel production does notmake a credible climate strategy when the company’s broader business model continues to rely on fossil fuels.

 

Furthermore, Eni’s biofuel activities in African countries have raised serious concerns about where its crops come from and whether they are grown sustainably, as well as how they affect local communities. According to research by the European campaign group Transport & Environment 4, Eni has been importing castor and croton oils (oils from non-food plants) from Kenya and the Republic of the Congo, relying on a system that deprives farmers of their land and leaves them poorer. Recent investigations show that crop production in Kenya - financed with $135 million from the IFC5 - is not delivering at Eni’s expectations, and the company is now importing large amounts of rapeseed – a crop also used for cooking oil and animal feed - from South Africa - at odds with its commitment not to compete with food production6.

 

Development finance needs to protect communities and civil society

Because of Eni’s track record of harming the climate and its failure to take responsibility for it, in May 2023 the Italian campaigning organisation ReCommon, together with Greenpeace Italy and 12 citizens, took Eni to Court for violating its obligations under the Paris Climate Agreement and fundamental human rights. It was the first climate lawsuit ever brought against a company in Italy. Since then, Eni has stepped up its own legal action against ReCommon and Greenpeace Italy.7 Lawsuits like these are knowing as SLAPPS (Strategic lawsuits Against Public Participation): court cases used to intimidate and silence critics by dragging them into long and expensive legal battles. The Coalition Against Slapps in Europe (CASE-EU) has given the Italian company three of its symbolic awards : “Corporate bully of the year” in 2021,8 “SLAPP Addict of the year” in 2025 9 and “Green gag award” in 2026.10

 

Legal action against environmental organisations can have consequences far beyond the parties directly involved; it can scare others into silence. This matters directly to development finance. Communities affected by large projects funded by banks like FMO and the organisations that support them must be able to question what companies say, look closely at how projects affect people and nature and stand up for their rights without being threatened with costly lawsuits or other kind of pressure.

 

For these reasons, we have urged FMO not to proceed with this loan. You can read the full letter.

---------------------

1 Eni Natural Energies Congo SAU

2 Eni Natural Energies Congo SAU is 100 % owned by Eni Natural Energies. In turn, Eni Natural Energies is 100% owned by Eni SpA

6 https://www.transportenvironment.org/articles/not-what-they-promised; https://www.eni.com/en-IT/media/press-release/2022/10/eni-concluso-approvvigionamento-olio-di-palma.html

8 2021 European SLAAP Contest Awards, 21/05/2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdPFcDB2Y_w

Read more about this subject