FMO did not follow its own rules in financing Barro Blanco dam
Dutch development bank FMO did not sufficiently take into account the rights of the local population and effects on the environment before approving a $ 25 million loan for the construction of the Barro Blanco dam in Panama. This is not in accordance with FMO’s own standards. This was revealed in the long-awaited report by the independent complaints mechanism (ICM) of the FMO and the German development bank DEG, released on May 29. The report was published in response to a complaint filed by the M-10, the movement representing the affected indigenous Ngöbe population, in May 2014. Both ENDS has been supporting the M-10 in its struggle against the dam for years, and was one of the organisations that supported the complaint.
We are pleased that the conclusions of the independent experts of the ICM support our view that the banks did not comply with their standards.
Failure to obtain consent
The dam’s artificial lake will partially flood the territory of the Ngäbe communities living on the shores of the Tabassará river. These people will be forced to leave their homes and places of religious and cultural value. Despite national and international obligations relating to human rights, project developer Genisa failed to obtainthe 'free, prior and informed consent' (FPIC) of the Ngäbe population. According to the report the “lenders should have sought greater clarity on whether there was consent to the project from the appropriate indigenous authorities prior to project approval”.” Another shortcoming relates to the Environmental and Social Action Plan that was appended to the credit agreement. This plan "contains no provision on land acquisition and resettlement and nothing on biodiversity and natural resources management. Neither does it contain any reference to issues related to cultural heritage. ."
In their public reaction to the report, FMO and DEG acknowledge the conclusion of the report that they were not fully appraised at credit approval, but they made no further concrete commitments to ensure that the rights of those affected by the dam will be respected.. The banks claim that they are “facing limitations in their influence” over government processes to come to a satisfactory agreement with all stakeholders involved. Earlier this year though, the development banks did try to influence the government. In February 2015 the Panamanian government suspended the construction of the dam on the basis of Genisa not acting in accordance with the agreed Environmental Impact Assessment. The breaches included the lack of a legitimate agreement between the Ngöbe and Genisa, and violations of environmental laws. In reaction to the decision to halt the project, the FMOsent a letter to the Vice President of Panama, urging the government to resume construction as soon as possible. According to the bank, closing down this project could "negatively influence future investment decisions in Panama."
Banks’ response is inadequate
Anouk Franck of Both ENDS is surprised by FMO's reaction: "Instead of insisting on resuming the project, the bank should have shown us that it takes the interests of the local population seriously and that it acts in accordance with its own policies. Whenever we have meetings with its representatives, FMO assures us that it supports its clients to improve their social and environmental policies and practices. But in the case of Barro Blanco, the bank has shown it does exactly the opposite. In light of the conclusion of the ICM’s reports, indicating the bank did not comply with its standards, we urge FMO to withdraw from the project. Furthermore, to prevent similar situations in the future human rights impact assessments should become standard procedure at FMO. This is an important instrument to ensure that human rights and environmental standards are guaranteed in future projects."
Also read the press release of Both ENDS, SOMO and others, published on the 1st of June.
Dutch newspaper 'De Volkskrant' also covered the story on the 1st of June (in Dutch): Nederlandse ontwikkelingsbank zat fout met stuwdam Panama
You can also read a summary of the report of the complaints mechanism.
For previous news on barro Blanco on our website:
19 May 2015: FMO pushed Panama to continue Barro Blanco dam
6 May 2015: Construction of Barro Blanco dam will be resumed
11 Feb 2015: Construction Barro Blanco dam finally suspended
7 May 2014: Complaint against FMO on grievance mechanism.org
14 Feb 2014: Filing a complaint with the FMO?
In this 'long read' on Barro Blanco you can find a short overview of what has happened around the dam in in the past few years.
Read more about this subject
The Barro Blanco dam project in Panama, which has Dutch financial support, is causing indigenous lands to disappear under water. Both ENDS is working to protect the rights of indigenous communities living near the dam.
Publication / 23 June 2023
Publication / 25 May 2023
Publication / 21 March 2023
Publication / 15 March 2023
Publication / 15 March 2023
Publication / 14 December 2022
Press release / 5 December 2022
Groups react with dismay to FMO’s position statement on Financial Intermediaries, pointing to outstanding human rights and climate concerns
On October 13th 2022, FMO published the final version of its Position Statement on Impact and ESG for Financial Intermediaries (FI statement). As civil society groups which have engaged with FMO on this topic for more than four years, we are extremely disappointed with the result. In the statement, FMO does not show sufficient commitment to ensuring its investments into financial intermediaries – which represent the bank's largest investment sector* – do not violate human rights or contribute to environmental harms.
Press release / 3 November 2022
The Netherlands breaks major climate promise to end public financing for international fossil fuel projects
Today, a week before the international climate summit in Egypt, the Dutch Government has broken a major climate promise it made last year to end public financing for international fossil fuel projects. International and Dutch NGOs argue that the new policy published by the Dutch Government on restricting finance for fossil fuels has such significant loopholes, that it essentially means The Netherlands has reneged on its promise.
News / 26 October 2022
Update October 27th:
Today our friends have been released after five nights in detention. We welcome this great news and we are happy and relieved that Babacar Diouf and the others who were arrested will soon be back with their loved ones.
Nonetheless this was a very bad signal from Senegalese authorities and police and an indication of the growing restriction on civic space in Senegal. It is unacceptable that freedom of expression is restricted, people should not have to go to jail for peacefully expressing their opinion - especially when their livelihood is at stake.
The lion's share of public budgets for climate, agriculture and development still goes to conventional agroindustrial projects that contribute to the current climate, food and biodiversity crises. Both ENDS and our partners are calling for a transition to agroecological practices that are people- and environment-friendly.
Blog / 12 October 2022
The Dutch government and Dutch businesses spend a lot of money on food production in developing countries. But, according to Karin van Boxtel, policy officer at Both ENDS, far too little of that money finds its way to sustainable, nature-inclusive producers.
Press release / 5 October 2022
Independent research confirms FMO’s responsibility for destruction caused by Barro Blanco dam, recommends compensation
Utrecht, 5 October 2022 - Dutch development bank FMO bears responsibility for the destruction of livelihoods, economic losses and environmental damage caused by the construction of the Barro Blanco dam in Panama, according to a report by the bank's Independent Complaints Mechanism (ICM). Indigenous communities affected by the dam are pleased that their complaints have been confirmed and reiterate their call for apologies and compensation.
Publication / 23 August 2022
News / 22 August 2022
Both ENDS partner IFI Synergy has filed a complaint to the World Bank on behalf of local inhabitants about the Nachtigal dam in Cameroon. The dam is causing considerable problems for local communities and local people feel that the compensation they receive is inadequate. They also feel that they were insufficiently informed and consulted before construction of the dam started.
News / 12 August 2022
This week we heard the sad news from Flint, Michigan, that Sandra Smithey has passed away. Sandra was for many years our pillar of support at the CS Mott Foundation. The foundation has supported the work of Both ENDS and of partners like Casa Fund and the NGO Forum on the ADB for more than 20 years, both financially and with its wide-ranging knowledge. One of Sandra’s ambitions was to make international money flows, such as development funding via the World Bank but also, for example, export credit insurance, fairer and more sustainable.
News / 28 June 2022
On Tuesday 28 June, the Honduran organisation COPINH and the Global Justice Association filed a complaint with the public prosecutor in the Netherlands against Dutch development bank FMO. For COPINH, this is part of their continued efforts to bring to justice those involved in the murder of their leader Berta Cáceres. FMO financed the Agua Zarca project in Honduras in 2014. The new complaint is based on documents indicating that FMO's money has been used improperly.
Despite the existence of many hydropower dams, foreign investments and large government spending on energy, and new plans for hydropower, oil and gas projects, the vast majority of rural Uganda still remains without electricity. Together with our local partners we are striving towards a sustainable energy strategy for Uganda that starts from the needs and wishes of local communities.
News / 10 June 2022
In a new Position Statement on Financial Intermediary (FI) Lending, Dutch development bank FMO argues for limited responsibility over the outcomes investments that are channeled through commercial banks, investment funds, and other financial intermediaries, representing by far the bigger sector of its portfolio. In doing so, FMO is undermining its development mission, including the protection of human rights and addressing the climate crisis. FMO intends to delegate these key responsibilities to its FI clients only, falling short of best practices of peer financial institutions. In a joint submission prepared by Both ENDS, Oxfam Novib, Recourse and SOMO, we argue that FMO can do much more to ensure the protection of human rights, the environment, and to measure the development impact of its indirect investments.
Letter / 10 June 2022
Both ENDS, SOMO, Oxfam Novib and Recourse sent in a submission to FMO's public consultation on its Position Statement on Financial Intermediaries. In this position statement, FMO only takes limited responsibility for the consequences of its investments through so-called financial intermediaries. We call upon FMO to publish a position statement that focuses on protecting human rights and the environment and take full responsibility for this.