From Entebbe to Accra: civil society is rewriting the rules of investment
By Fernando Hernández Espino and Bart-Jaap Verbeek
Almost a year after African civil society gathered in Uganda to adopt the Entebbe Declaration, the call to transform international investment governance continues to gain strength. From the 6th to the 9th of October, over 50 civil society organisations from across West Africa, including from Ghana, Senegal, Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire, Cameroon, Gambia, Sierra Leone, as well as from Kenya and Latin America, are convening in Accra to deepen and operationalise the Declaration’s vision.
By Fernando Hernández Espino and Bart-Jaap Verbeek
Almost a year after African civil society gathered in Uganda to adopt the Entebbe Declaration, the call to transform international investment governance continues to gain strength. From the 6th to the 9th of October, over 50 civil society organisations from across West Africa, including from Ghana, Senegal, Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire, Cameroon, Gambia, Sierra Leone, as well as from Kenya and Latin America, are convening in Accra to deepen and operationalise the Declaration’s vision.
The Entebbe Declaration, a programme for reclaiming investment frameworks to ensure they work for people and the planet, calls for terminating harmful treaties, dismantling investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), strengthening domestic and regional justice, and putting obligations on investors, not just rights. Crucially, it places climate justice, human rights, gender equity, labour rights and community consent at the centre of any future framework. This is the anchor for our work in Accra.
Why this matters now is clear. Across Africa, and far beyond, investment rules have long prioritised corporate interests over democratic decision-making and sustainable development. Investor-state dispute settlement has punished governments for protecting people and nature, chilled progressive policy, and diverted scarce public funds away from health, education and climate adaptation. The system has not delivered on its promises of jobs, technology transfer or resilient economies. We set this out last year, and the evidence has only grown since.
The West African Civil Society Sustainable Investment Forum in Accra is about moving from principles to plans. Over three and a half days, we will share hard-won lessons on ending or replacing unfair treaties, examine regional pathways such as the AfCFTA Investment Protocol, and explore practical tools that countries and communities can use immediately, including contract transparency, community consent, and investor obligations. The aim is to leave with an agreed set of priorities for national advocacy, regional coordination and north-south collaboration, all rooted in what CSOs judge achievable in the coming year.
Outcomes
Three outcomes guide us.
First, coordinated action on treaty exits and alternatives. Many African countries face windows to terminate outdated bilateral investment treaties. We will map these opportunities, pool legal capacity, and coordinate advocacy so governments can act with confidence, replace risky clauses with modern domestic law, and secure policy space for climate and development.
Second, a shift from extraction to transformation. We will promote investment that builds productive capacity, adds local value and respects planetary limits, rather than accelerating extractivism. That includes supporting agroecology, equitable energy transitions and regional supply chains, while ensuring communities can withhold consent where projects threaten rights or livelihoods.
Third, stronger, inclusive coalitions. The Civil Society Sustainable Investment Forum in Entebbe in 2024 showed the power of convening organisers, researchers, journalists, unions and community leaders in one room. Accra will deepen that practice, with lighter language, practical tools and shared messaging that travel from policy tables to community meetings. We will also connect the African agenda with allied efforts in Latin America and, next, in Asia, building towards a truly global conversation led by those most affected.
This forum is not an end in itself. It is a working meeting designed to consolidate perspectives, foster learning, and strengthen collaboration across diverse groups. The agenda is shaped by participating CSOs, and the process is rooted in their lived realities, political contexts, and strategic priorities. It also provides a space to build trust and clarity between organisations engaged in the same broader struggle, so that future steps can reinforce one another rather than compete for attention.
We left Entebbe with a mandate. In Accra we intend to honour it. Our commitment is to help create the conditions for investment to serve public purpose, not private power, and to do so through collaboration across countries and continents. If you share that ambition, follow the forum’s outcomes, use what we produce, and, wherever you are, help make the case for a new investment settlement fit for a warming, unequal world.
Fernando and Bart-Jaap work with partners across Africa and beyond to advance fair, sustainable alternatives to today’s investment regime. The Accra Investment Civil Society Forum takes place from 6 to 9 October 2025.
For more information
Read more about this subject
-
Dossier /International trade and investment with respect for people and planet
The network of international trade and investment treaties is large and complex. The Netherlands alone has signed more than 70 bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and is party to the trade and investment agreements concluded by the EU, like the EU-Mercosur and EU-Indonesia trade deals.
-
Dossier /Trade agreements
International trade agreements often have far-reaching consequences not only for the economy of a country, but also for people and the environment. It is primarily the most vulnerable groups who suffer most from these agreements.
-
Dossier /Rights for People, Rules for Corporations – Stop ISDS!
Indigenous communities in Paraguay saw their attempts to regain their ancestral lands thwarted by German investors. In Indonesia, US-based mining companies succeeded to roll back new laws that were meant to boost the country’s economic development and protect its forests. This is the level of impact that investment treaties can have on social, environmental and economic development and rights. Why? Because of the ‘Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement’ clauses that are included in many such treaties.
-
News / 15 October 2026ISDS infringement complaint filed with the European Commission
The Netherlands and Portugal join four other EU countries facing such a complaint.
-
Press release / 15 October 2026Dutch and Portuguese organisations file EU complaint over investment treaties that let companies and sanctioned Russian oligarchs sue EU countries for compensation
The Netherlands and Portugal join four other EU countries facing such a complaint, as the Global Days of Action against Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) begin.
-
Dossier /Global Alliance for Green and Gender Action (GAGGA)
GAGGA rallies the collective power of the women's rights and environmental justice movements to realize a world where women can and do access their rights to water, food security, and a clean, healthy and safe environment.
-
Publication / 29 September 2026
-
News / 29 September 2026Q&A: New Zealand's climate rollback and the EU trade agreement
On 29 September 2026 / 30 September in Aotearoa New Zealand, Both ENDS lodged a complaint with the European Commission under the EU-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement. These are the questions we are asked most often, and our answers. The complaint summary, the case explainer and the key public sources are linked at the end of this page.
-
Press release / 29 September 2026New Zealand faces its first climate complaint under EU trade rules
UTRECHT / WELLINGTON, 29 September 2026 /30 September in Aotearoa New Zealand
Both ENDS, a Dutch environmental justice organisation, has lodged a formal complaint with the European Commission arguing that New Zealand has broken the climate promises it made in its free trade agreement with the European Union. It is the first complaint on environmental and climate grounds under the Commission's Single Entry Point, the mechanism that lets civil society ask the EU to enforce the sustainability commitments in its trade agreements.
-
Publication / 3 July 2026
-
News / 14 April 2026New report: Phasing out ISDS in the Netherlands: a roadmap
Today, Both ENDS and SOMO are publishing the report Phasing out ISDS in the Netherlands: a roadmap. In the report, we highlight the Netherlands’ role in the ISDS system and offer practical guidance on phasing out ISDS.
-
Publication / 14 April 2026
-
News / 26 March 2026New project: Climate Accountability in EU Trade
Through its new project “Climate Accountability in EU Trade: Testing the SEP and DAGs for Climate-Linked FTA Enforcement” Both ENDS, with support from the European Climate Foundation, is exploring how the European complaints mechanism (SEP) and Domestic Advisory Groups (DAGs) can be more effectively used to advance climate accountability. The project runs for 13 months, until end of 2026.
-
News / 22 January 2026Shell files new arbitration against the Netherlands over Groningen gas field closure
Shell is suing the Netherlands in yet another attempt to evade its responsibility for decades of gas extraction in Groningen. For years, gas production has triggered earthquakes, damaged over a hundred thousand homes, and left residents living in prolonged insecurity, still waiting for repairs, reinforcement, and justice.
-
Blog / 25 November 2025COP30 shows why dismantling ISDS is essential for real climate action
Standing in Belém during COP30, I felt the weight of the moment. We came to the Amazon hoping for decisive progress on phasing out fossil fuels, yet the final outcome fell far short of the ambition science and justice demand. The agreement brought welcome commitments on adaptation finance and global indicators, but it refused to confront the structural forces that make climate action so difficult.
-
News / 5 November 2025Another ISDS claim hits the Netherlands: Petrogas sues over solidarity contribution and royalty regulations
SOMO and Both ENDS strongly condemn the newly revealed investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) case filed by Petrogas, an Omani oil and gas company operating two shallow-water gas fields in the Dutch North Sea, against the Netherlands under the Netherlands-Oman bilateral investment treaty (BIT).
-
News / 5 November 2025Interview: Both ENDS at COP30 for Climate Justice and Systemic Change
Both ENDS is present at COP30 to advocate for genuine access to climate finance for locally led, gender-just climate solutions and the mechanisms that facilitate this, including those for farmer-led restoration. Furthermore, the organisation participates to ensure the crucial connection between the climate negotiations and the trade and investment frameworks that shape them.
Learn more about the Both ENDS team at COP30 below, and find all the activities and side-events in which Both ENDS will participate.
-
News / 23 October 2025TotalEnergies financiers beware: EACOP is eating up money, nature and livelihoods
A new analysis shows that the developers of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline, led by France’s TotalEnergies, are being forced to self-finance the project almost entirely. The analysis, part of a new Finance Risk Updatefrom a coalition of African and International civil society organisations, shows that the companies have abandoned plans to raise 60% of the project’s growing costs from bank loans, and are now on the hook for almost 90% of the costs themselves.
-
News / 23 September 2025With the undemocratic splitting of the EU-Mercosur deal, Europe is missing the chance to lead on fair trade
Recently, many newspapers have written about Brussels’ rush to finalize the trade agreement between the EU and the South American Mercosur countries. According to the European Commission, national parliaments do not need to approve it because the trade part and the “political” part have been separated. This “splitting” means that the trade part can be approved as an EU-only decision by the European Council and the European Parliament, while national parliaments are sidelined and the political-cooperation part is postponed. Both ENDS and its partners are deeply concerned and are calling on the Dutch government to vote against this outdated agreement.
-
News / 22 September 2025EU-Indonesia Trade Deal Threatens Communities and Environment
On September 23th the European Union and Indonesia concluded their negotiations of the EU-Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), a free trade agreement between the EU and Indonesia. Both ENDS condemns this agreement for favoring corporate interests over those of local communities and the environment.
