Burghard Ilge and Fernando Hernandez: "This WTO conference will be more important than ever"
This week, Geneva will be the epicenter of world trade, as trade ministers and other representatives from around the world gather for the World Trade Organization (WTO) ministerial conference. Liesje Schreinemacher, the Dutch Minister of Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, is present with a delegation. Our colleague Burghard Ilge is joining as an official member of the delegation, to represent civil society organisations. Colleague Fernando Hernandez will also travel to Geneva, to follow and try to influence the negotiations from outside the conference room together with other civil society organisations from around the world.
In the WTO, trade ministers and authorities from around the world meet to discuss and define the frameworks and guidelines for trade in goods and services. Such rules have global implications for the well-being of billions of people. In the coming weeks, tough negotiations will take place on, among other things, fisheries subsidies, agriculture, the WTO rules on intellectual property – more topical than ever since the start of the COVID pandemic – and the reform of the WTO itself. According to Burghard and Fernando, this WTO summit will become more important than ever before.
What exactly is that summit, what is the goal and who generally goes there?
Burghard: "The WTO consists of different parts and has consultation structures at various levels. The ministerial conference, which we are now going to, is the most important of these. All important decisions about the WTO are taken there. Negotiations are among other things about new WTO rules, all in the field of trade, of course, the name says it all. A new round of negotiations, the so-called Doha Development Round, was launched in 2001. That round is still ongoing, no agreement has yet been reached. Various topics such as trade and agriculture are negotiated, but the main aim of this particular 'round' is to address the problems developing countries face as a result of the current WTO agreements."
Fernando: "Unfortunately, little progress has been made in these negotiations in recent years, mainly because the richer countries seem less and less willing to continue the negotiations on the Doha development agenda. An example of this is the refusal of the rich countries to temporarily lift patents on COVID vaccines, which are covered by the WTO.
Burghard, you are a member of the delegation: what does that mean?
Burghard: "Yes, that's right. The Dutch government always includes three advisors in its government delegation to the ministerial conference: one from the business community, one from the trade unions and one from the NGOs. The Dutch government delegation can consult these advisors in case specific questions would arise during the meeting. As a member of the delegation, I am not allowed to speak with the press or participate in public events organised by civil society organisations. I am actually a kind of messenger: I talk to the civil society organisations and try to understand what their positions and needs are with regard to the issues at hand, which I will then convey to the Dutch delegation as best I can.
And Fernando, so you're part of the civil society group?
Fernando: "Yes, that's right. I follow the negotiations on a big screen, together with a large group of representatives from other civil society organisations from around the world. We are in constant consultation and based on what is discussed we formulate our common positions. We then try to convey this to the press and to the various delegations, so we will also work very well with NGO advisors, such as Burghard for the Netherlands. The participation of NGOs is very important, as what is being negotiated has enormous consequences for human rights, the climate and food security, to name just a few examples. Often the trade ministers are mouthpieces for the interests of business lobbyists and not those of civil society. It is very important that we serve as a counterbalance through our participation, lobbying and advocacy."
What is your main message at this particular WTO meeting?
Fernando: "It is time to recognise that our current free trade system has widened the global inequality gap, decimated local economies, and increased poverty, hunger and insecurity. There is much that the WTO can do, for example in the field of intellectual property rights. Unfortunately, this has also become very clear during the COVID crisis: because of the strict rules under the WTO, the so-called TRIPS, countries that don't have patents on vaccines and medicines are not allowed to produce these themselves. They are completely dependent on the expensive and often scarce supply from the countries that do have these patents, usually the richer countries. Ironically, the production of vaccines and medicines often takes place in the poorer countries in the Southern Hemisphere, but are destined for the richer countries. What civil society organisations from around the world want is a temporary lift of intellectual property rights under the WTO, a 'TRIPS waiver'. That way, in principle all countries could produce enough vaccine and medication or get it cheaply. The EU, and especially the Netherlands, is obstructing this. The Piri-motion, which was adopted in the Dutch Parliament at the beginning of this year, does not seem to help much in the EU's position in the negotiations on a COVID TRIPS waiver."
Burghard: "There should also be exceptions to the ban on stockholding and buying up food stocks. Governments in developing countries sometimes do this, to support their small farmers and to be able to offer food aid to their poorer population. The WTO does not allow that because it is seen as illegal agricultural subsidy. But our main concern is that the argument of crisis will be misused to quickly push through agreements that are unfavorable for developing countries. That has happened before and that is a real possibility."
Are civil society organisations actually listened to at the WTO summit?
Fernando: "Well, not really. And this is very problematic: on the one hand, civil society has no formal say in what is at stake, and on the other, the current global crisis requires that voices from below are also taken into account in the WTO. The WTO does provide briefings for civil society organisations during the conference on what is happening and how the negotiations are going, but civil society organisations must convey their concerns and wishes via the governments of countries. That is not possible directly at the WTO. As a group we sometimes try to generate attention for the issues we are concerned about through the international press or through symbolic actions, in order to increase the pressure a bit."
What do you think should happen during the WTO meeting, when will you go home feeling satisfied?
Burghard: "The question is how ambitious we can be. To start with, the countries that are now negotiating among themselves in separate groups on topics for which the WTO has no mandate, should stop doing so. They should invest in the broad negotiation process between all WTO members. Separate, bilateral negotiations between countries or groups of countries are prohibited under the WTO in any case, but it happens on a large scale, again especially between the richer countries. Another hot and controversial issue is the subsidies on fisheries. I would be satisfied if the new WTO agreements on this matter were in line with processes of UN agencies that combat over-fishing, instead of undermining those processes. At this moment, the WTO mainly encourages large-scale fishing, and that has to change, in general everyone agrees on this. But in the eagerness to do something about it, it seems that the new rules that are now being negotiated, will make it more difficult for developing countries to support and develop their own, often small-scale, fisheries sector. This could never have been the goal."
Fernando: "For me, the interests of the planet and the people who live on it must come first. The WTO must clearly show at this conference that this is indeed the case. And, of course: the US, the EU and other countries such as Switzerland must stop blocking the request for a TRIPS waiver for COVID vaccines and medications, which is supported by a large majority of WTO members. Even though we have learned from experience and do not have much hope that the agreements made on this conference will be helpful for developing countries, we continue to exert pressure to make the WTO move in the right direction. If we wouldn't do that, the balance would tip even more in favor of the big companies and wealthier WTO members such as the Netherlands."
For more information
Read more about this subject
-
Dossier /
Make Innovations work for all: reframing Intellectual Property Rights
It sounds so logical: patents and other intellectual property rights protect investments in innovations, allowing more innovations to be made from which the whole world can benefit. Such as new medicines or drought-resistant crops. But in practice, these property rights often have the opposite effect, hindering access to innovations for those who need them the most.
-
Dossier /
Trade agreements
International trade agreements often have far-reaching consequences not only for the economy of a country, but also for people and the environment. It is primarily the most vulnerable groups who suffer most from these agreements.
-
External link / 15 June 2022
Open letter to Trade Ministers at the World Trade Organization (WTO)
Joint CSO call to all WTO Trade Ministers to not accept the current draft of Ministerial Decision on the TRIPS Agreement and demand a real Waiver
-
News / 25 April 2022
Call for sign-on: No to UPOV in Indonesia
The European Union (EU) continues to demand that countries of the South introduce plant variety protection rights according to UPOV 91 in free trade agreements. This is happening in the ongoing negotiations of the EU with Indonesia, trying to take away Indonesia's flexibility to implement a law that suits its own needs and priorities. We therefore call to sign our letters on this subject to the European Commission and the Indonesian government.
-
News / 13 June 2022
The WTO and intellectual property rights: what it means for us
Intellectual property law is regulated at various levels around the world. At the international level, intellectual property rights are mainly laid down within the World Trade Organization (WTO) and in trade agreements. But what does this in practice mean for us? With this infographic, we've visualized what happens when a holder of intellectual property rights - usually a big company - thinks his rights are being violated.
-
Publication / 12 April 2022
-
Publication / 29 November 2021
-
Publication / 30 October 2023
-
Press release / 30 June 2022
Civil society calls upon EU and Indonesia to respect the rights of Indonesia’s farmers
89 NGOs and farmers' organisations from Indonesia, the EU and around the world sent open letters to the EU Commission and the Indonesian government today, calling on them to refrain from any clause that restrict farmers' rights in a future free trade agreement.
-
Event / 6 December 2021, 14:00 - 15:15
WEBINAR: EU's push for strong Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) on seeds
The European Union's (EU) foreign trade policy has many implications for the sustainability of food systems in developing countries, heavily impacting farmers, breeders, and citizens. The unhidden promotion by the EU of strong intellectual property rights on plants affects food systems from its very basis, i.e., the seeds that are available for farmers to grow. Amongst these intellectual property rights, the main instrument that is advocated by European authorities is the 1991 Act of the UPOV Convention, which provides exclusive rights to breeders over the propagating material of new plant varieties, while diminishing the rights of others to use the material for further breeding and hampering with the rights of farmers to freely save, use, exchange and sell their seeds.
-
News / 11 December 2015
What are we going to do at the WTO-conference in Nairobi?
Nairobi, Kenya's capital city, will be the epicenter of international trade from 15 to 18 December 2015. The representatives of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which currently has 162 member countries, will come together to negotiate. The different countries tend to have very different and often conflicting interests, which makes it difficult to reach agreements. Burghard Ilge of Both ENDS travels with Minister Ploumen as an official adviser and mediator from civil society. His role is to inform the Minister about the views and interests of civil society organisations around the world, in order for her to take these positions into consideration during the negotiations. We asked Ilge some clarifying questions.
-
Publication / 7 November 2018
-
Dossier /
Investment treaties
Investment treaties must be inclusive, sustainable and fair. That means that they must not put the interests of companies before those of people and their living environment.
-
Publication / 12 November 2020
-
Letter / 30 June 2022
Open letter to the European Commission concerning plant variety rights in the Free Trade Agreement with Indonesia
Today, almost 90 organisations and networks from around the world, including Both ENDS, sent a letter to the European Commission to urge the EU to stop including UPOV91 in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). The main objective of UPOV91 is to further erode traditional seeds rights and to regulate local seed markets in the interest of internationally operating seed companies.
This matter is urgent because currently, the EU and Indonesia are negotiating an FTA. Including UPOV91 in this FTA means that Indonesia will have to change its policies, which will take away the farmers' rights to:
- breed, save and exchange all seeds and other planting material
- participate in decisions concerning seed improvement/ breeding, selection, quality standards, pricing, production, distribution and diversity
- customary practice especially in regard to indigenous seed
- be protected from being sold fake and inappropriate seed
- have a true choice between the use of certified and seed from fellow farmer managed seed systems. -
Event / 21 February 2022, 16:00 - 17:30
Webinar and launch of new publication about EU-Mercosur
What is the EU-Mercosur association treaty and why is it controversial? What could be the implications of the treaty for people and their livelihoods both in EU and Mercosur countries? For more information about these and other issues, see our new publication and join our interactive webinar next week!
Register here
-
Letter / 26 June 2020
Letter to governments over wave of Covid-19 claims in 'corporate courts'
Countries could be facing a wave of cases from transnational corporations suing governments over actions taken to respond to the Covid pandemic using a system known as investor-state dispute settlement, or ISDS. 630 organisations from across the world, representing hundreds of millions of people, are calling on governments in an open letter to urgently take action to shut down this threat.
-
Letter / 30 June 2022
Open letter to the Indonesian Government concerning plant variety rights in the Free Trade Agreement with Indonesia
On behalf of almost 90 CSO's and networks including Both ENDS, IGJ has sent a letter to the Indonesian government about the free trade agreement with the European Union. In this agreement, the EU pushes Indonesia to align its plant variety protection laws with UPOV 91, which would threaten farmers' access to seeds, food souvereignty and agrobiodiversity. The main objective of UPOV91 is to further erode traditional seeds rights and to regulate local seed markets in the interest of internationally operating seed companies.Including UPOV91 in this FTA means that Indonesia will have to change its policies, which will take away the farmers' rights to:
- breed, save and exchange all seeds and other planting material
- participate in decisions concerning seed improvement/ breeding, selection, quality standards, pricing, production, distribution and diversity
- customary practice especially in regard to indigenous seed
- be protected from being sold fake and inappropriate seed
- have a true choice between the use of certified and seed from fellow farmer managed seed systemsThe joint organisations therefore call upon the Indonesian government to resist the ask of the EU to comply with UPOV 91.
-
News / 26 June 2020
630 civil society groups sound alarm over wave of Covid-19 claims in 'corporate courts'
Countries could be facing a wave of cases from transnational corporations suing governments over actions taken to respond to the Covid pandemic using a system known as investor-state dispute settlement, or ISDS. Cases could arise from actions that many governments have taken to save lives, stem the pandemic, protect jobs, counter economic disaster and ensure peoples' basic needs are met. Threats of cases have already been made in Peru over the suspension of charging on toll roads, and law firms are actively advising corporations of the options open to them. 630 organisations from across the world, representing hundreds of millions of people, are calling on governments in an open letter to urgently take action to shut down this threat. The letter below is published today.
-
Publication / 15 February 2022