Both ENDS
Intellectual property law is regulated at various levels around the world. At the international level, intellectual property rights are mainly laid down within the World Trade Organization (WTO) and in trade agreements. But what does this in practice mean for us? With this animation, we've visualized what happens when a holder of intellectual property rights - usually a big company - thinks his rights are being violated.
Today, almost 90 organisations and networks from around the world, including Both ENDS, sent a letter to the European Commission to urge the EU to stop including UPOV91 in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). The main objective of UPOV91 is to further erode traditional seeds rights and to regulate local seed markets in the interest of internationally operating seed companies.
This matter is urgent because currently, the EU and Indonesia are negotiating an FTA. Including UPOV91 in this FTA means that Indonesia will have to change its policies, which will take away the farmers' rights to:
- breed, save and exchange all seeds and other planting material
- participate in decisions concerning seed improvement/ breeding, selection, quality standards, pricing, production, distribution and diversity
- customary practice especially in regard to indigenous seed
- be protected from being sold fake and inappropriate seed
- have a true choice between the use of certified and seed from fellow farmer managed seed systems.
Het buitenlandse handelsbeleid van de Europese Unie (EU) heeft veel gevolgen voor de duurzaamheid van voedselsystemen in ontwikkelingslanden en specifiek voor boeren, veehouders en burgers. De EU dringt op allerlei manieren aan op stevige intellectuele eigendomsrechten op planten en dat heeft impact op voedselsystemen vanaf de basis, namelijk vanaf de zaden die beschikbaar zijn voor boeren om te verbouwen. Binnen de set van intellectuele eigendomsrechten is het belangrijkste instrument dat wordt bepleit door de Europese autoriteiten, de wet van 1991 van het UPOV-verdrag. Dat verdrag verleent exclusieve rechten aan kwekers op het teeltmateriaal van nieuwe plantenrassen, terwijl de rechten van anderen om het materiaal te gebruiken voor verdere veredeling en de rechten van boeren om hun zaden vrijelijk te bewaren, te gebruiken, te ruilen en te verkopen, juist ernstig worden ingeperkt.
Both ENDS co-wrote a Joint CSO Submission on the Draft Revised Version of the EIB Transparency Policy to the EIB. The transparency policy does not adequately reflect key international standards and principles regarding transparency, as set out in the Global Transparency Initiative's Transparency Charter for International Financial Institutions.
The policy should meet the nine key principles as set out in the Global Transparency Initiative's Transparency Charter for International Financial Institutions, namely: 1) the right of access,; 2) automatic disclosure,; 3) access to decision-making; 4) the right to request information; 5) limited exceptions; 6) appeals; 7) whistleblower protection; 8) the promotion of freedom of information; and 9) regular review.
