Is the Netherlands insuring a controversial gas extraction project in Mozambique?
At the end of last week, oil and gas company Total announced that, through its export credit insurer Atradius DSB, the Dutch government is participating in a funding package for a controversial gas extraction project in Mozambique. The project, in which various Dutch and foreign companies are involved, is having a deep impact on the local population and the natural environment in the area. Which Dutch companies the government will be insuring is not yet clear.
Fishers and farmers already affected
The approval of the funding package means that the government assumes that all the companies involved in the Total-led gas project are complying with international human rights and environmental agreements. Both ENDS, however, has serious doubts about this. "The preparations for the project are in full swing and the people who live in the area are already paying the price," says Anne de Jonghe of Both ENDS, who has had contact with the fishers' and farmers' organisations in the area. "Although the project provides work for some people and brings facilities to the area that were not there before, most of the local inhabitants are seriously concerned. Many have had to move to places where they have no access to land or fishing grounds, so that they can no longer make a living. Although agreements were made within the project to ensure that fishers can continue to fish, their fishing grounds at sea are now much less accessible."
Violence in the region
In the region where the investments are being made, there is also increasing violence by 'insurgents'. Dutch ministers Sigrid Kaag and Stef Blok recently informed the Dutch House of Representatives about this issue. In July, the gas developments were explicitly threatened in Al-Naba, the newspaper of the Islamic State (IS). IS propaganda focuses mainly on who benefits from the exploitation of natural resources in the area. The Mozambique government, the investors and the companies in the area do not speak openly about the increasing violence, and rely on (para)military support to protect the project.
Agreements not open to the public
To ensure that the project is implemented responsibly, Atradius DSB and Total have made agreements on how Total is going to comply with international guidelines and how Atradius DSB is going to monitor that compliance. "But these agreements are unfortunately not open to the public," says De Jonghe. "Transparency is crucial for the farmers and fishers in the area, so that all stakeholders know what is going to happen and can preferably have a say in what that is. It is, after all, their living environment and their future."
Multi-Stakeholder Platform
The Dutch government has set up a Multi-Stakeholder Platform in Mozambique so that the Mozambique and Dutch governments, donors, the private sector and civil society can exchange information and coordinate their plans. The local people have not yet had any real benefit from the Platform, as it is dominated by the private sector, there is a language barrier and the majority of the people at the table do not come from the area where the project is taking place. Moreover, partly because of the violence between different parties in the region, it can be dangerous for local inhabitants and organisations to speak out.
Local people's interests
Both ENDS has been calling on the Dutch government for many years to stop supporting the fossil fuel sector. "If the Netherlands does decide to provide public support," De Jonghe says, "it has a responsibility to ensure that it is does so properly. Atradius DSB should, at the very least, take strict measures to ensure that the companies involved comply with the rules and are transparent about their plans, the consequences for local people and how they will be compensated. In addition, the concerns and interests of all farming and fishing communities must be taken seriously in the Multi Stakeholder Platform."
For more information
Read more about this subject
-
Dossier
Export Credit Agencies: Who pays the price?
Both ENDS calls on the government only to provide export credit insurance to sustainable projects that cause no social and/or environmental damage in the countries where they take place.
-
Dossier
Gas in Mozambique
In 2011 one of the world’s largest gas reserves was found in the coastal province of Cabo Delgado, in the north of Mozambique. A total of 35 billion dollars has been invested to extract the gas. Dozens of multinationals and financiers are involved in these rapid developments. It is very difficult for the people living in Cabo Delgado to exert influence on the plans and activities, while they experience the negative consequences. With the arrival of these companies, they are losing their land.
-
Publication / 11 November 2020
-
Press release / 11 November 2020
Export support for dirty energy in Africa
Since the signing of the Paris Climate Agreement, rich countries have provided almost 50 times as much export support for fossil fuel related projects as for clean energy projects in four African countries. This is the conclusion of a report written by five environmental organisations from Ghana, Nigeria, Togo and Uganda, in cooperation with Friends of the Earth Netherlands and Both ENDS. The rich countries insured energy projects with a total value of 11 billion US dollars through their export credit agencies (ECAs). More than half of this export support is related to fossil fuels. Only 1% went to sustainable renewable energy.
-
Dossier
Fair Green and Global Alliance (FGG)
Together with civil society organisations from all over the world, the Fair Green and Global (FGG) Alliance aims for socially just, inclusive and environmentally sustainable societies in the Netherlands and the Global South.
-
Dossier
Paris Proof Export Support
Almost two-thirds of the export credit insurances that Atradius DSB provided in the 2012-2018 period went to the fossil energy sector. That is contrary to the climate agreements that the Netherlands signed in Paris.
-
Video / 21 October 2014
The meandering roads of Suape
This video tells the story of the families that were forced out of there homes and evicted from their lands in the Suápe region in Brazil. The local authorities have decided to expand the shipyard and the sea-harbour, but they have failed to take into account the negative impacts on the local people and their environment. Dutch company Van Oord is executing part of the dredging, supported by export credit agency Atradius DSB.
-
Video / 21 October 2014
Tatuoca, a stolen island
This video tells the story of the families that were forced out of there homes and evicted from their lands in the Suápe region in Brazil. The local authorities have decided to expand the shipyard and the sea-harbour, but they have failed to take into account the negative impacts on the local people and their environment. Dutch company Van Oord is executing part of the dredging, supported by export credit agency Atradius DSB.
-
External link / 29 May 2019
Export credit agencies’ role in development finance (Annual Report 2018)
Export credit agencies (ECAs) play a central role within the complicated web of global development finance. In 2018, Both ENDS invested in strengthening cooperation among organisations working on ECAs, building a strategic global collaboration to stop ECAs' support of fossil fuels and improve their environment and human rights record.
-
News / 30 June 2020
Extra export support from the government must stimulate green growth
Almost 40 civil society organisations and networks from around the world, including Both ENDS, today sent a letter to Dutch Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation Sigrid Kaag and State Secretary for Finance Hans Vijlbrief. They are asking the ministers to ensure that the expansion of export credit insurance as a result of the Corona crisis contributes to a green recovery.
-
News / 28 August 2017
Politicians ask for sustainable export support
Last June, Both ENDS published a report which showed clearly that, through export credit insurance provider Atradius Dutch State Business (ADSB), the Netherlands is supporting the fossil fuel sector on a large scale. Between 2012 and 2015, ADSB provided billions of euros in insurance and guarantees, on behalf of the State of the Netherlands, to fossil-related export projects. This support is completely out of line with the Paris Climate Agreement. On 20 June, members of parliament Lammert van Raan (PvdD) and Sandra Beckerman (SP) submitted questions to the State Secretaries for Finance and for Infrastructure and the Environment.
-
Publication / 7 March 2016
-
News / 6 February 2017
Press Release: No Dutch public support for Istanbul’s controversial new airport
Turkey is building Istanbul’s third and the world’s biggest airport in the Northern Forest area on the outskirts of the city. The project is strongly opposed by local communities and NGO’s, as it destroys the environment and violates basic human and local community rights.
-
News / 9 December 2019
Fisher folk in Indonesia file a complaint against the Dutch Export Credit Agency Atradius DSB
At the end of November, the organisations WALHI South Sulawesi (part of Friends of the Earth) and Both ENDS filed a formal complaint with the Dutch export credit agency Atradius DSB. Despite the warnings from local communities for the negative consequences of a land reclamation project in the bay of Makassar, Atradius DSB advised the Dutch government to provide dredging company Boskalis with insurance for the execution of the project. The consequences for the fish stock, the beach and the lives of thousands of small-scale fishing communities are severe. Atradius DSB has not sufficiently investigated these harmful consequences beforehand.
-
News / 27 November 2020
Climate case against Shell is particularly crucial for the Global South
Next week, the climate case brought against Royal Dutch Shell by Dutch environmental organisation Milieudefensie is due to start. Milieudefensie hopes to force the company to stop causing dangerous climate change and adopt a more sustainable course. Six Dutch organisations have decided to become co-plaintiffs in the case. They include ActionAid and Both ENDS, organisations that work outside the Netherlands on human rights, gender equality, environment and sustainable development. Though, at first glance, the case may not seem relevant to them, nothing is farther from the truth, as Nils Mollema of ActionAid and Niels Hazekamp of Both ENDS explain.
-
Publication / 17 November 2019
-
News / 11 December 2017
Stop funding fossils at the 'One Planet Summit' in Paris
Yesterday, the French President Macron, the President of the World Bank Group, Jim Yong Kim, and the Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, met with international leaders and committed citizens from around the world in Paris. According to the organisers, the aim of this gathering was to 'address the ecological emergency for our planet' as 'two years to the day after the historic Paris Agreement, it is time for concrete action.'
-
Press release / 18 November 2019
Press release: Government undermines its own climate policy with export credit insurance
The Netherlands provides export credit insurances and guarantees worth 1.5 billion euros annually to Dutch companies active in the oil and gas sector abroad. This support amounts to one and a half times the annual amount that the Cabinet of Prime Minister Rutte mobilises for climate initiatives worldwide. The intended effects of Dutch international climate policy are more than offset by this fossil export support. That is the conclusion of a new report from Both ENDS which is published today.
-
Publication / 18 June 2017
-
Press release / 12 February 2019
Press Release: 6 organisations join climate lawsuit against Shell
Amsterdam, 12 February 2019 - Fossil fuel giant Royal Dutch Shell is facing legal action from environmental and human rights organisations if it fails to align its growth plans with global climate goals aimed at averting catastrophic global warming.