Déjà vu: from Famatina via Orissa and Dakota to Groningen
Whenever I see pictures of the people in the Dutch province of Groningen whose houses are collapsing because of gas extraction and who, even if they wanted to move somewhere else, would never be able to sell them, I can't help but think of all the people worldwide who have been experiencing the same problems, sometimes for decades. Every time I see the anger and powerlessness of the people of Groningen, the comparison to the many people we have been working with for many years in many parts of the world comes to my mind.
Not only in Groningen, but in the whole world, normal people are resisting oil and gas extraction, mining, dam construction and other large-scale projects that are being carried out ‘in the common interest’. While the Netherlands is often directly involved in the development of large-scale projects throughout the world, there is little attention or understanding for the struggles these people are engaged in. We like to see ourselves as the country that brings development and can easily close our eyes to reality in far-off lands, as we ourselves are not often confronted with the consequences of such economic activities.
It is difficult for us to really feel anything when we see images of indigenous people in brightly-coloured clothes resisting the Dakota Access Pipeline or the Belo Monte Dam. Or to really understand why women and men risk their lives to ensure that a hydraulic power plant is not built in their territory. Or why thousands of people in India and Indonesia, in Argentina and El Salvador, protest against the arrival of large mining companies if they will provide so many jobs?
But now, what people have to deal with on a daily basis in the rest of the world is suddenly happening here, in our own country. In Groningen, people are protesting against the injustice they have had to put up with for so many years. What is going on now in Groningen around gas extraction has many similarities with the struggle of indigenous groups in the US or Brazil, the women’s resistance in Honduras and the anti-mining protests in Indonesia.
Groningen shows us in close up how normal, patient and reasonable people are first ignored, then palmed off with formalities, forced to resort to the courts where one ruling after the other is in their favour, but any real action is simply put on the back burner. It shows us how they ultimately have no other choice than to express their displeasure in public, in the hope that this will increase the pressure on politicians.
Now that the public debate has erupted with full force and they finally have a podium, the duped people of Groningen are understandably no longer as patient and reasonable. As a consequence of the complete lack of respect they have endured, they now express their anger on public television, directing it for example at the Prime Minister, who has become a symbol of what they have been put through. And the ruling class in the Netherlands responds promptly, just as everywhere else in the world where people desperately fight to save their livelihoods, by declaring that it is ‘most indecent’ to rant and rave against their democratically elected leaders.
Groningen also shows that the suffering of people who fight against large-scale developments goes much further than material losses alone. It is about much more than earthquakes and subsiding houses. People are frustrated; for many years, they have not been taken seriously, their problems have trivialised and every solution is brushed aside or discouraged.
Fortunately, there is hope for the people of Groningen. Thanks to their persistence, they now have the support of the whole country. And thanks to the way our country is organised, they can conduct their campaign without fear of their lives, and there is a lot of solidarity with their cause. They are not a minority of indigenous people or women, who can easily be ignored. They are not intimidated or murdered if they stand up for their rights. Their protests are finally heard and there is a good chance that they will receive compensation for their material losses. And this is of course the way it should be.
This, however, is not the case in many other countries. Including countries in which the Netherlands invests and does business, but looks the other way when people – with good reason – oppose mining, dam projects and paper production plants. It is high time that we took not only the people of Groningen seriously, but also all those people in the world who – often due to the activities of the Netherlands – are in the same situation, and made sure that Dutch involvement abroad leads to a better life for everyone, both here and there.
Read more about this subject
-
Publication / 10 July 2019
-
Blog / 25 November 2024The Need for Civic Space in Global Policymaking
and Kyra Pohlan
In today’s interconnected world, international forums play a pivotal role in shaping policies and strategies that impact communities and the environment worldwide. These gatherings, whether they focus on climate change, water resources, or biodiversity, are critical venues where decisions are made that affect the lives of billions of people and species. However, for these decisions to be truly inclusive and effective, they must be informed by the voices of those most affected by climate change and environmental degradation.
-
News / 7 October 2018Our Director ranking 52nd on Dutch ‘Sustainable 100’-list
We are very proud that our director Daniëlle Hirsch has been included again in the ‘Sustainable 100’ (an annual ranking list published by Dutch newspaper Trouw), and has gone up more than 40 spots compared to last year! Danielle was included in the list because of the many things she does with her organisation as a whole, but she got the higher ranking for the way she combines her criticism of the destructive role of the Netherlands as a trading nation and large cause of CO2 emissions in the world (often supported by the Dutch government), with a constructive attitude when it comes to finding alternatives and solutions.
-
Event / 4 November 2021, 16:45 - 18:00UNFCCC COP 26 side event ‘Aligning export finance with the Paris Agreement: high time to phase out fossil fuels’
Many countries heavily support fossil fuel investments abroad through their export credit agency (ECA). This contributes to carbon lock- in, whereby companies or even countries commit themselves to a certain amount of greenhouse gas emissions for the lifetime of the infrastructure — oftentimes years or even decades. This seriously delays the transition to renewable energy sources, and is certainly not in line with Art. 2.1c of the Paris Agreement.
Highlighting the impacts caused by export finance in the global South, this side event will provide concrete recommendations to decarbonize export credit agencies.
-
News / 4 June 2021Welcoming step of FMO to phase out fossil fuels from their direct investments
FMO's new position statement on fossil fuel investments commits to ending new direct finance in the downstream and midstream coal and oil sectors, whilst still allowing for investments in gas-fired electricity generation under exceptional circumstances only. Both ENDS welcomes this development as a step in the right direction.
-
Letter / 20 February 2023
Letter of international CSO's to Dutch Parliament: close gaps in Dutch policy on limiting public finance to fossil fuels
In October 2022, the Dutch government published a policy to implement the COP26 statement in which it promised to stop public finance for fossil fuel projects abroad by the end of 2022 . The proposed policy, unfortunately, has quite some 'loopholes' that make it possible for the Dutch government to keep supporting large fossil projects abroad for at least another year. These projects often run for years and will have a negative impact on the countries where they take place for decades to come.
-
Publication / 23 September 2019
-
Press release / 19 May 2022122 CSOs warn signatory countries they have only six months left to meet COP26 commitment to end international public finance for all fossil fuels
Today, 122 civil society groups are releasing letters to eleven government signatories to the Glasgow Statement on International Public Support for the Clean Energy Transition, laying out the actions they must take as soon as possible to meet their commitment. In this joint statement at COP26, 35 countries and 5 public finance institutions committed to end their international public finance for 'unabated' fossil fuels by the end of 2022, and instead prioritise their "support fully towards the clean energy transition."
-
Press release / 3 November 2022The Netherlands breaks major climate promise to end public financing for international fossil fuel projects
Today, a week before the international climate summit in Egypt, the Dutch Government has broken a major climate promise it made last year to end public financing for international fossil fuel projects. International and Dutch NGOs argue that the new policy published by the Dutch Government on restricting finance for fossil fuels has such significant loopholes, that it essentially means The Netherlands has reneged on its promise.
-
Letter / 9 November 2020
Input into FMO’s public consultation on Climate Action Commitments and Fossil Fuel Statement
Both ENDS and partners gave their input on FMO's public consultation on Climate Action Commitments and Fossil Fuel Statement. Both ENDS and partners are pleased that FMO is finally taking a stand regarding fossil fuels, but in our opinion it could be more ambitious.
-
Press release / 26 October 2021New report: 33.7 billion euro's worth of assets have committed to fossil fuel divestment
Today, on the eve of the UN Climate Change Conference, COP26, the fossil fuel divest-invest movement released a new report that details how institutions representing an unprecedented total of EUR 33.7 trillion worth of assets have now committed to some form of fossil fuel divestment, a figure that's higher than the annual GDP of the United States and China combined.
-
Publication / 18 June 2017
-
Publication / 14 May 2017
-
Publication / 9 May 2018
-
Publication / 14 May 2017
-
Publication / 24 October 2019
-
Blog / 25 November 2016Celebrate countervailing power!
This is the text of the speech given by Danielle Hirsch on the 'Nacht van de Tegenmacht' (Night of Countervailing Power)
-
Blog / 19 September 2019A forgotten opportunity worth 1.5 billion euros
Reward high-risk international business projects investing in a green future and stop support for the international fossil industry
The climate is 'hot'. Everyone is talking about it. 'Everyone needs to do something' calls the government in its recently started public campaign. Good plan. Let's really do something. For a start, we can stop supporting international trade in fossil energy by our own multinationals. That would free up 1.5 billion euros which we could use to combat climate change on an international scale and at the same time give our own innovative businesses a boost. Today's Vergeten Klimaattafel (Forgotten Climate Roundtable) will discuss the opportunities for the Netherlands to have a real impact. And those opportunities are enormous. Because our big money and our influence lie beyond our borders.
-
Letter / 9 December 2024
People and the Planet Entebbe Declaration: Reclaiming investment frameworks for people and the planet
The time for change is now. Civil society demands international investment
frameworks that are aligned with economic justice, social and environmental
sustainability, and the needs of communities worldwide. -
News / 10 November 2020FMO takes a step towards divesting from fossil fuels
The Dutch development bank FMO has published a statement about fossil fuels to take steps in climate action. Both ENDS and partners are pleased that FMO is finally taking a stand regarding fossil fuels, but in our opinion it could be more ambitious. In order to really contribute to sustainability and equality, it is essential that development banks stop investing in harmful fossil projects.
