Dutch participation in the AIIB, an international bank with Chinese characteristics
and Stijn Deklerck of Amnesty International Nederland
On 12 and 13 July, the Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank (AIIB) will be holding its annual meeting in Luxembourg. This is the fourth annual meeting of the AIIB which was set up on the initiative of China. As a shareholder, the Netherlands will be attending the meeting.
In its recent policy memorandum on China 'A New Balance', the Dutch government identifies its position as a shareholder in the AIIB as an opportunity to discuss conditions for financing and standards at international financial institutions with the People's Republic. We urge the Netherlands to make full use of this opportunity. The AIIB claims it wants to be 'lean, clean and green' but a lack of transparency and space for civil society participation, as well as weak social and environmental standards, suggest that the opposite is true.
Clear Chinese mark
The AIIB is an international multilateral bank that focuses on financing infrastructure projects, primarily in Asia and Oceania. The bank is officially not controlled by China, but as initiator and largest shareholder, the People's Republic clearly leaves its mark on the bank. The AIIB's headquarters are located in Beijing, the first AIIB president Jin Liqun is Chinese, and Chinese finance minister Lou Jiwei has been appointed first president of the board of governors. In the early stages, the bank kept its distance from China's Belt & Road Initiative, but more recently the AIIB president has spoken of the complementary nature of the two initiatives. He has also openly said to be in favour of the AIIB investing more in Chinese infrastructure projects.
After three years, it has become clear that this is an international bank with Chinese characteristics. A number of problematic issues that occur in China can also be observed in the practice of the bank. The AIIB displays a lack of good and strict social and environmental standards, of transparency and of participation by civil society.
When the Netherlands decided to participate in the AIIB in 2015, parliament adopted a motion stating that the bank's social and environmental standards had to be at least equivalent to those of other international financial institutions. The AIIB's standards, however, are much more open ended and leave a lot more room for interpretation. A number of other important policy instruments, like the complaints mechanism and the policy document on the openness of information, did not become effective until 2019, by which time the bank had already invested millions of dollars. A much-heard argument to justify the project financing in this early period is that the projects were co-financed by other public banks, whose standards were applied. One project, however (Beijing Gas) was fully financed by the AIIB itself, with no co-financing from others.
Inadequate monitoring and supervision
A further problem is that the bank's executive board has little power to monitor and supervise the actions of the management. This also provides insufficient safeguards for compliance with international standards. Last year, shareholders approved a proposal that public investments of up to 200 million dollars and private investments of up to 100 million dollars would be left to the bank's president, with no clear monitoring by the board.
This inadequate monitoring cannot be rectified externally by NGOs and journalists, as there are no clear rules for when and how information must be made public, and decision-making is not transparent. This minimises the chances for external checks on decisions made by the bank's president.
Inaccessible complaints mechanism
Lastly, there are few opportunities for people adversely affected by the bank's projects to register complaints. The complaints mechanism is extremely inaccessible, especially when compared to that of other banks, and those wishing to submit complaints must comply with very strict conditions. The complaints mechanism does not have an independent status within the bank: an operational manager is responsible for both assessing complaints and evaluating projects.
Exclusion from the 2019 annual meeting in Luxembourg
We have seen during the preparations for the AIIB's 2019 annual meeting that, unlike with the World Bank or the Asian Development Bank, no opportunity has been granted to civil society to organise side-meetings. And unfortunately a number of our partner NGOs have been excluded from participating in the meeting, while the reasons for this and the applied selection process remain unclear.
European taxpayers' money
The AIIB annual meeting in Luxemburg presents an ideal opportunity for the Netherlands and the other European shareholders of the bank to take their responsibility. We call on them to place human rights and the environment clearly on the agenda, and to involve civil society more actively in discussions on these issues. This will send a clear signal that the bank belongs to all its participants and not only to China, where space for civil society is steadily shrinking and NGOs cannot take part in discussions on human rights. It is also an opportunity for the Netherlands and other European participants to demonstrate the importance they assign to openness of information, civil participation and monitoring of policy compliance to European taxpayers, who help to finance the bank.
For more information
Read more about this subject
Advocating for responsible policies of development banks
Development banks should comply with strict environmental and human rights rules to ensure that their projects benefit and do not harm the poorest groups. Both ENDS monitors the banks to make sure they do.
Publication / 10 December 2018
Publication / 30 June 2017
Blog / 24 June 2019
The European Investment Bank should withdraw from gas investments
The European Investment Bank EIB should get rid of its gas-investments, and the Netherlands can take the lead in this. The Netherlands appears to be relying less and less on gas in its energy policy, and also seems to focus on gas-free investments at the EIB. Now it is important to maintain this position and also convince the other EU countries.
Letter / 5 August 2021
A joint CSO submission to the European Investment Bank, Standard 11 on intermediate finance in the Public consultation on the EIB Group's
16 civil society organisations including Both ENDS have written a letter of concern to the European Investment Bank about a newly proposed standard for the Bank its intermediate finance investing. Both ENDS contribution to the contents of the joint letter consists out of proposals for improvement of screening, scoping, due diligence, appraisal, monitoring and supervision of high-risk clients and sub-projects. through financial intermediaries and clear and mandatory social, environmental and human rights requirements for FI investing matters.
News / 8 November 2019
European Commission, help the European Investment Bank go Fossil Free!
On Thursday November 7th, a group of European NGO's including Both ENDS, sent a letter to Vice-President of the EU Frans Timmermans, in which they ask him to support the phase out of European Investment Bank’s fossil fuel financing by the end of 2020.
Letter / 23 August 2021
Joint CSO Submission A Gender comment on the newly proposed EIB E&S Framework
6 civil society organizations, including Both ENDS have submitted a gender comment on the newly proposed EIB Environmental and Social Framework. The EIB Environmental and Social Standards has to be updated to ensure that due attention to gender specific impacts, risks and related mitigation strategies is integrated in the policy and each standard, as well the assessment needs to specifically address the needs and problems of all genders. A lot of improvements can be made in the integration of gender aspects in policy and standards, in order to prevent violation of the rights of women and girls during project implementation, and tools (widely used by other organisations) and or commitments for their development should be included (inclusive consultations, Gender assessments and analyses, gender impact assessment, Legal Assessment Tool (LAT) for gender-equitable land tenure, gender responsive tools for prevention of violence.
Letter / 23 August 2021
Reflecting the duality of gender and climate in the EIB’s Environmental and Social Sustainability Framework’s Standard 5 on Climate Change
This briefing of Eurodad, co-authored by Pieter Jansen, Both ENDS aims to outline recommendations on how the European Investment Bank should address the interconnected issue of gender inequity and the climate crisis in the newly proposed environmental and social policy.Severe climate change has consequences for human rights, including the right to life. As such, under the European convention on human rights the EIB has a duty to stop carbon-emissions related investments. The EIB and project promoters must monitor a project's greenhouse gas emissions and the climate risks of the project on the natural environment, and the women possibly affected by the project. The newly proposed policy should ensure that project promoters, who apply for EIB funding, submit a gender and social inclusion plan, and full participation and engagement of women, local communities and stakeholders in the Climate Risk Vulnerability Assessment methodology.
Letter / 5 August 2021
Joint CSO Submission EIB Group Environmental and Social Policy
25 civil society organisations, including Both ENDS have submitted a comment on the overarching policy of the newly proposed Environmental and Social Framework of the EIB Group. The EIB has to undertake environmental, climate, social and human rights assessment and appraisal of proposed projects to inform the decision of financing and must not rely on a clients' self-assessment and reporting (solely). The Policy needs to state clearly what the due diligence, monitoring and reporting responisibilities for the EIB are, in particular regarding human rights and contractual clauses with clients should enshrine the standards in all EIB operations, enabling for suspension of contracts if the standards are not implemented.
Letter / 1 October 2014
Policy briefing note on World Bank safeguards, October 2014
Both ENDS letter to the World Bank on the Environmental and Social Safeguards policies review. The World Bank safeguards review is part of a reorganization that aims at making lending cost-effective with less rules in place, which likely entails an increase in the number of problem projects. The reorganization aims at making lending
more cost-effective, forms in place. Safeguards policies are of crucial importance for project affected people to hold banks to account. However, Environmental and Social Frameworks (ESF) nowadays replace safeguards at banks. The ESF model leads to a reduction of a Bank's direct and mandatory role in overview, including due diligence, monitoring, and evaluation, of Bank funded activities and investments, along with a shift towards a greater reliance on client self-assessment and self-reporting. Our main ask is a return to binding, rules-based safeguards policies at banks.
News / 18 November 2019
European Investment Bank goes fossilfree
Good news for the climate: last week, the European Investment Bank (EIB) decided to stop investing in fossil fuels by 2021. This is part of its new energy strategy.
Letter / 15 May 2022
Both ENDS Comments and recommendations on the Bank Group’s Environmental and Social Policy of the AfDB Integrated Safeguards System
This letter by Both ENDS to the African Development Bank is a comment written in reaction to a draft version published by the Bank of its Environmental and Social Policy as part of a formal public consultation held by the Bank. This comment was sent to the bank along a joint submission letter with other CSOs, and specifically responds to the overarching Policy.
The bank's flexible requirements for clients and national standards for risky projects dilute safeguards. Project approval should be predicated on specific and binding targets for compliance and reflect input from communities involved.
Letter / 15 May 2022
Joint Submission of comments and recommendations to the Public Consultation on AfDB Integrated Safeguards System
Together with 29 other CSO's, we've submitted our comments and recommendations in the Public Consultation on the AfDB Integrated Safeguards System. These include that the Bank should prioritize community-led development and human rights-based approaches; protect natural resources and tackles environmental and climate crises; raise the bar on access to information, transparency and accountability; facilitate participatory processes in policies, programmes and projects; and end inequality, poverty, and the cutback and privatization of vital services.
Publication / 11 February 2016
Letter / 10 June 2022
Joint submission on FMO’s Position Statement on Financial Intermediaries
Both ENDS, SOMO, Oxfam Novib and Recourse sent in a submission to FMO's public consultation on its Position Statement on Financial Intermediaries. In this position statement, FMO only takes limited responsibility for the consequences of its investments through so-called financial intermediaries. We call upon FMO to publish a position statement that focuses on protecting human rights and the environment and take full responsibility for this.
Press release / 10 February 2021
Transparency at development bank FMO is seriously lacking
The Dutch development bank FMO is not sufficiently transparent about the projects it finances and is therefore acting contrary to its mandate. This is evident from a new report published by the International Accountability Project (IAP) and the Foundation for the Development of Sustainable Policies (FUNDEPS), endorsed by 28 organizations including Both ENDS, SOMO, and Oxfam Novib. The research assesses FMO's disclosure and access to information practices for investments proposed between January 1, 2019, and May 31, 2020. Only in 25% of the cases was it disclosed what potential negative consequences an investment by FMO would have for people and the environment.
News / 4 June 2021
Welcoming step of FMO to phase out fossil fuels from their direct investments
FMO's new position statement on fossil fuel investments commits to ending new direct finance in the downstream and midstream coal and oil sectors, whilst still allowing for investments in gas-fired electricity generation under exceptional circumstances only. Both ENDS welcomes this development as a step in the right direction.
Publication / 25 December 2015
External link / 10 December 2018
Human Rights Defenders are a Cornerstone of Sustainable Development
An Open Letter to States and Development Financiers on the need to ensure that development interventions support the realization of human rights, safeguard human rights defenders and guarantee meaningful public participation
External link / 31 May 2018
Agua Zarca debacle leads to policy changes at FMO (Annual Report 2017)
Sometimes things must go terribly wrong before big players start to move. In March 2016, Honduran activist Berta Cáceres was murdered because of her leading role in the protests against the Agua Zarca hydro dam, co-financed by the Dutch FMO. One and a half year later, FMO changed their policies to prevent such events in the future.