Brumadinho’s painful “seas of mud”
By Carolina de Moura
Six years ago, Brumadinho tailings dam I, from the Paraopeba Complex, owned by mining company Vale, collapsed. January 25th, 2019, forever changed the lives of thousands. The scars remain open, and the quest for justice, remembrance, and prevention of future mining crimes endures despite all adversities. This was manslaughter coupled with socio-environmental devastation of proportions difficult to measure. These are irreparable losses and damages that could have been avoided if it wasn’t for the greed, negligence, and irresponsibility of decision-makers at Vale, the German certification firm Tüv Süd, and the state of Minas Gerais.
This article was originally posted on projetopreserva.com.br (in Portugese)
Each person was affected in a uniquely manner by this tragedy. The mother who lost her daughter. The wife left without her husband. The children permanently deprived of a parent. The surviving worker who lost dozens of friends. The community stripped of its identity, its peace, and its river. The local defenders that had warned about Vale’s negligent practices before the tragedy, but were ignored. So many dreams and life plans shattered. Everyone with different memories, sorrow, and suffering physical, psychological, and emotional consequences.
What collective popular memory has been built by the affected population? Which memories will remain from this tragedy? How will this story be told to future generations? The answers to these questions are still in the making and greatly depend on everyone’s critical thinking, responsibility and actions taken. What do you think when you see a sophisticated Vale’s propaganda in prime-time television? Do you believe in the narrative that Minas Gerais state cannot survive without mining, and that we all must accept it as a "necessary evil"? Vigilance is crucial to avoid having your opinion manipulated by those who do not care about you.
For those who have lost and suffered in so many levels due to Vale’s decisions, it is painful to hear statements such as: “It was all very tragic, but Vale has already paid significant compensation and learned from the tragedy.”; “The state signed a multi-billion-dollar agreement benefiting many people.”; “Justice institutions are monitoring dams.”; “It’s time to forget and move on.”
Last week, the activities marking the six-year anniversary of Brumadinho’s criminal tragedy aimed to alert society for the urgency of a structural change in the mining business model. Despite the significant power imbalances between Vale and the affected communities, no one should forget, downplay, or normalize the atrocities and the violations committed by Vale, together with its accomplices and allies, before and after January 2019.
This year, the central message of AVABRUM (the victims’ families association) emphasizes the memories of the irreparable losses. No amount of money in the world can bring back the smell, the voice, or the embrace of a loved one who was murdered.
If the corporations’ punishment is only based on fines and financial compensations, the mining sector will continue its policy of profit over (dead) people. The criminal investigations revealed documents with a budget forecast for a dam collapse: Vale calculated how many lives could be lost and how much compensations would cost—and made its choice. Criminal justice must show that corporations are not above the law and hold accountable those who knew the risks, had a duty to act, and yet chose to remain silent. Only a guilty verdict will serve as a warning sign to all decision-makers in companies who put human lives and the ecological balance of the planet at risk.
The future of the regions Córrego do Feijão and Jangada is another significant question. After all the devastation, trauma and suffering, these areas urgently need social, environmental and cultural healing, regeneration and preservation. The federal government must reclaim the territory by revoking the mining rights given to Vale and its associates and the Minas Gerais state government must cancel all environmental licenses granted for mineral exploitation in the region. The land must return to the people for projects and initiatives that promote social and economic well-being for all.
After more than a decade of community resistance to mining and six years of post-crime struggle, we’ve learned in Brumadinho that it’s impossible to trust Vale’s good faith. Governments and the judicial system must show that they are not aligned to serve and protect the interests of those with the most economic power.
What can be done when companies and governments fail to take action and prevent mining crimes? Resist and mobilize people with art, debates, denunciations, public protests, solidarity actions, technical and political training, research, investigations, and much more. Join a collective and move forward with love for life and a commitment to truth.
About Carolina de Moura
Journalist specialist Environmental Management & Sustainability, Brumadinho resident, and Project Lótus Coordinator, at the Cordilheira Institute, promoting creative economy among women defending territories in conflict with mining. Part of the Political Coordination of the Latin American Network of Women Defenders of Social and Environmental Rights. Regular collaborations with international organizations seeking accountability and due diligence for companies and foreign investors involved in the mining chain, including UN hearings and European Parliament activities. She is the protagonist of the documentary “The Illusion of Abundance.”
For more information
Read more about this subject
-
Dossier /Seeking justice for the affected communities of Vale’s mining disasters in Mariana and Brumadinho
In 2015 and 2019, the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais experienced two severe mining tragedies in Mariana and Brumadinho, due to the same mining company: Vale. Since then, the affected communities have been seeking justice, via the criminal punishment of the responsible parties, and a fair compensation for the loss of their loved ones, their homes and their livelihoods. Both ENDS supports local CSOs by amplifying their quest for justice within an international audience and, more specifically, by raising awareness amongst Dutch investors in Vale about the high risks this company’s activities pose for people and the environment.
-
Dossier /Towards a socially and environmentally just energy transition
To address the climate crisis we need to urgently transition away from fossil fuels towards clean, renewable energy. However, this transition is not only about changing energy sources. It requires an inclusive and fair process that tackles systemic inequalities and demanding consumption patterns, prioritizes environmental and social justice, and which does not repeat mistakes from the past.
-
Dossier /Rights for People, Rules for Corporations – Stop ISDS!
Indigenous communities in Paraguay saw their attempts to regain their ancestral lands thwarted by German investors. In Indonesia, US-based mining companies succeeded to roll back new laws that were meant to boost the country’s economic development and protect its forests. This is the level of impact that investment treaties can have on social, environmental and economic development and rights. Why? Because of the ‘Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement’ clauses that are included in many such treaties.
-
Blog / 25 November 2025COP30 shows why dismantling ISDS is essential for real climate action
Standing in Belém during COP30, I felt the weight of the moment. We came to the Amazon hoping for decisive progress on phasing out fossil fuels, yet the final outcome fell far short of the ambition science and justice demand. The agreement brought welcome commitments on adaptation finance and global indicators, but it refused to confront the structural forces that make climate action so difficult.
-
Dossier /Wetlands without Borders
With our Wetlands without Borders program, we work towards environmentally sustainable and socially responsible governance of the wetlands system of the La Plata Basin in South America.
-
News / 5 November 2025Interview: Both ENDS at COP30 for Climate Justice and Systemic Change
Both ENDS is present at COP30 to advocate for genuine access to climate finance for locally led, gender-just climate solutions and the mechanisms that facilitate this, including those for farmer-led restoration. Furthermore, the organisation participates to ensure the crucial connection between the climate negotiations and the trade and investment frameworks that shape them.
Learn more about the Both ENDS team at COP30 below, and find all the activities and side-events in which Both ENDS will participate.
-
News / 5 November 2025Overview of Both ENDS events at COP30 in Belem, Brazil
Both ENDS is present at COP30 to advocate for genuine access to climate finance for locally led, gender-just climate solutions, and for the mechanisms that make these possible, including those supporting farmer-led restoration. The organisation also engages to highlight the crucial connection between climate negotiations and the trade and investment frameworks that shape them.
Below is an overview of the Both ENDS team at COP30 and a detailed look at the activities and side-events in which Both ENDS will participate.
-
Publication / 16 October 2025
-
Publication / 16 October 2025
-
Publication / 9 October 2025
-
News / 22 September 2025EU-Indonesia Trade Deal Threatens Communities and Environment
On September 23th the European Union and Indonesia concluded their negotiations of the EU-Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), a free trade agreement between the EU and Indonesia. Both ENDS condemns this agreement for favoring corporate interests over those of local communities and the environment.
-
Dossier /Soy: trade in deforestation
The rising demand for soy is having negative consequences for people and the environment in South America. Both ENDS reminds Dutch actors in the soy industry of their responsibilities and is working with partners on fair and sustainable alternatives.
-
Blog / 12 August 2025Nickel mining for the energy transition: who is accountable for the damage?
Photo blog - In June, I travelled to Indonesia with our partner organization Puanifesto to research the impacts of nickel mining in East Sulawesi. On July 13th, the news broke that the European Union and Indonesia have reached a political agreement on a free trade agreement that was years in the making, called the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA). Nickel from Sulawesi is already being used in European cars. This makes it all the more important that we ensure that human and environmental rights are secured in mining and refining operations in Indonesia, before the road is opened to more extraction and exploitation for the European market. The conversations we have had with communities and workers on East Sulawesi show that more binding regulations are necessary to make this happen and ensure an energy transition that is socially and environmentally just.
-
News / 16 July 2025Case Study: Fighting Environmental Transphobia and Social Fragmentation in Brazil
In the face of environmental transphobia, a form of discrimination where trans and gender-diverse communities are disproportionately impacted by environmental degradation,excluded from climate policies, and often met with stigma and exclusion by environmental justice movements, Grupo Orgulho, Liberdade e Dignidade (GOLD) has emerged as a bold and visionary force for change in Brazil. At the heart of this movement is Débora Sabará ,GOLD’s leader, a travesti activist who has fought tirelessly to place the perspectives andneeds of LGBTIQAPN+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Intersex, Queer, Asexual, Pansexual, Nonbinary and other identities), Indigenous and Afro-Brazilian communities at the center of environmental justice conversations.
-
News / 16 July 2025Case Study: Community Paralegals Defending Land Rights from Extractive Industries and Land Grabs in Mozambique
Across Mozambique, land represents more than just territory. It is the cornerstone of livelihoods, culture, and autonomy for many communities. When companies arrive, claiming large portions for mining, oil exploration or agribusiness, residents face significant challenges in asserting their rights. Mozambique’s Land Law (1997) grants communities user rights, ensuring they can occupy and use land for subsistence and cultural purposes.
-
News / 16 July 2025The challenges of climate change, gender inequality, and conflict
This FCDO-supported project, part of the GAGGA programme, brought together 6 women-led community-based organisations from around the world to explore how they navigate the combined challenges of climate change, gender inequality, and conflict. Through a Feminist Participatory Action Research approach, the organisations documented strategies ranging from land rights advocacy to climate-resilient agriculture, highlighting how extractive industries, militarisation, and patriarchal systems drive exclusion and insecurity. Their findings are now informing donors and policymakers on the need to support grassroots women’s leadership. In the following interview, the project lead shares more about the research, key insights, and its broader impact.
-
News / 10 July 2025Shell's Silent Exit: Evading Accountability in the Niger Delta
Following Both ENDS & Kebekatche Women Development & Research Centre participation in Shell’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) and a formal follow-up in writing, the response received from Shell plc raises more questions than it answers.
-
Dossier /Fair Green and Global Alliance (FGG)
Together with civil society organisations from all over the world, the Fair Green and Global (FGG) Alliance aims for socially just, inclusive and environmentally sustainable societies in the Netherlands and the Global South.
-
Blog / 2 July 2025Women at the frontlines of climate action: local power for global change
By Tamara MohrLast week, GAGGA, the Global Alliance for Green and Gender Action, with Both ENDS as one of the Alliance members, together with FCAM and Mama Cash, organised its Global Meeting in Indonesia. The goal of this meeting was to recognise, celebrate and look ahead at cross-movement and cross-regional connections, to strengthen the collective power of gender, climate and environmental justice movements.
-
Publication / 1 July 2025
