The Netherlands can radically reduce its agrarian footprint
In the weeks following the elections, Both ENDS is looking at how Dutch foreign policy can be influenced in the coming years to reduce our footprint abroad and to work in the interests of people and planet. We will be doing that in four double interviews, each with an in-house expert and someone from outside the organisation.
Our first interview is with Karin van Boxtel and Volkert Engelsman about the Netherlands' role in the global food system. Van Boxtel is co-interim director of Both ENDS and an expert on food systems and international trade. Last year, she was co-initiator of a manifesto that calls for a Dutch agricultural policy that also works for farmers worldwide. Engelsman is an entrepreneur and pioneer in biological agriculture, and founder of Eosta. But above all, he is an innovative free thinker. He recently set up the Robin Food Coalition, a joint initiative of businesses and organisations that are already working on the agricultural transformation.
The Netherlands urgently needs to change to a more sustainable food system. How can that be achieved?
Engelsman: "Change depends on a minority of pioneers. There is always a group of forerunners, followed by a middle group and then a group of stragglers coming along behind. Politicians can only make choices if they have a democratic majority. That makes them followers. Many Dutch companies, like artificial fertilizer and pesticide manufacturers, benefit from everything staying the same. If you, as a politician, try to introduce measures to change things, you can't count on much support from them."
But if the government doesn't do it, who will?
Engelsman: "We have to search out the 'hotspots', where the potential for change does exist, such as biological and regenerative agriculture. The battle should not only be fought on moral grounds but also on the basis of facts and calculations. When the real costs of the current agricultural system are made visible to everyone, it is easy to persuade them because they see that every euro in subsidies for the current farming system generates three euros in social costs."
Van Boxtel: "There are increasingly loud voices against fossil subsidies, an argument that is supported by statistics. We also have a lot of statistics on agriculture and it is up to us to use those statistics to reinforce the very simple message that intensive farming and stock-breeding are not the future. We have many examples of how to do things differently, like the future farmers and food forest pioneers in the Netherlands, Cameroon and Costa Rica.'
The Netherlands is a major player on the world stage: we export around 122 billion euros in agricultural products, 30 % of which goes to countries outside the EU. The largest proportion of that is floriculture, meat and dairy products. But the Netherlands also exports its intensive farming system, precisely the system that you say we need to replace. What must happen to bring that change about?
Engelsman: "We need a different narrative. People still argue the 'we need to feed the world's population'. But feeding the world isn't about yield per hectare, but a fair distribution of prosperity. And making the Global South even more dependent on seeds, fertilizer and pesticides from the West doesn't bring us any closer to achieving that. And what do we mean by 'feeding the world'? People or animals? 80% of the world's crops are used for animal feed."
Van Boxtel: "Our international policy – including the trade agenda – supports Dutch agribusiness. But the starting point should be: what do people themselves need so that support contributes to a fairer distribution of food and a more healthy ecosystem? To give one example: embassies play a role in promoting the Dutch seed sector. Yet, in a country like Kenya, 70 to 80 percent of farmers are dependent on informal seed systems, in which they exchange and reproduce their own seeds. Those systems need strengthening. These farmers don't need an even more active Dutch seed sector selling them seeds and pesticides."
So fewer exports. Won't that have a harmful effect on the Dutch economy?
Van Boxtel: "We need to take the lead on the basis of quality and sustainability, and in a respectful manner. By listening to communities around the world and hearing what they need."
Engelsman: "Leadership doesn't start with complaining about others, but by setting a good example. We are already doing that in Europe, by the way. We have the Green Deal and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. Companies have to show what their impact is. If they don't do that, they don't get a declaration of approval and consequently no funding. That rearguard battle about this has already been fought in Brussels."
Van Boxtel: "The debate on agriculture in the Netherlands is dominated by powerful players like LTO and Agractie. It is in their interests to preserve the status quo. But there is also 'BV Nederland', which sees the Netherlands as a commercial community and which is setting a good example. That's how a business model should be built up."
Engelsman: "My message to politicians in the coming years is primarily to listen to the pioneers who are already taking action to initiate the agricultural transformation. They need to sit around the table and take part in the debate. We are already taking significant steps with initiatives like the Robin Food Coalition, but our political leaders really should listen to them much more closely. What needs to be done to achieve the transition? What hurdles are they coming up against? Only if we have that discussion will we get any idea of where we need to go and how. The new government needs to break through the current power structures."
Van Boxtel: "We need different forms of countervailing power: not only power that offers an alternative, but also power that shows the way and the power or working together. We need the protestors, the pioneers and the group that gains strength in numbers. We have to keep on joining all those forces together, nationally and internationally, so that a stronger and stronger movement evolves in the direction of fair and sustainable food production worldwide. By listening not only to the big agrarian corporations, but also – and especially – to the trailblazers, our political leaders can give this movement sufficient space to develop and expand."
For more information
Read more about this subject
-
News / 18 December 2023Recommendations for Dutch foreign policy that works for people and planet, everywhere
The parliamentary elections in the Netherlands are over, and the dust has somewhat settled. No matter what government emerges from the process, one thing is clear: in the Netherlands the main focus is on the Netherlands. Foreign affairs were hardly mentioned during the elections and the same applies to the process of forming a new coalition. More alarmingly, some of the winners in the elections want to cut themselves off even further from the world around us. -
News / 21 December 2023The Netherlands is certainly not more Catholic than the Pope
The Netherlands is well on its way with the energy transition at home, but our country continues to encourage Dutch investments in fossil projects elsewhere. This is obviously not in line with the climate goals and, moreover, these kinds of projects cause major problems in the countries where they take place. What can a new cabinet do to reduce the Dutch footprint abroad? Ellen Mangnus discussed this with several experts: today part 2.
-
Publication / 11 November 2020
-
Press release / 3 November 2022The Netherlands breaks major climate promise to end public financing for international fossil fuel projects
Today, a week before the international climate summit in Egypt, the Dutch Government has broken a major climate promise it made last year to end public financing for international fossil fuel projects. International and Dutch NGOs argue that the new policy published by the Dutch Government on restricting finance for fossil fuels has such significant loopholes, that it essentially means The Netherlands has reneged on its promise.
-
Dossier /Towards a socially and environmentally just energy transition
To address the climate crisis we need to urgently transition away from fossil fuels towards clean, renewable energy. However, this transition is not only about changing energy sources. It requires an inclusive and fair process that tackles systemic inequalities and demanding consumption patterns, prioritizes environmental and social justice, and which does not repeat mistakes from the past.
-
Publication / 15 March 2023
-
Letter / 20 February 2023
Letter of international CSO's to Dutch Parliament: close gaps in Dutch policy on limiting public finance to fossil fuels
In October 2022, the Dutch government published a policy to implement the COP26 statement in which it promised to stop public finance for fossil fuel projects abroad by the end of 2022 . The proposed policy, unfortunately, has quite some 'loopholes' that make it possible for the Dutch government to keep supporting large fossil projects abroad for at least another year. These projects often run for years and will have a negative impact on the countries where they take place for decades to come.
-
News / 20 February 2023Almost 60 organisations send a letter about fossil export support to Dutch Parliament
Today, a letter, undersigned by almost 60 organisations from countries that face the consequences of fossil fuel projects or stand in solidarity, has been sent to the Dutch Members of Parliament. This Thursday, a debate about the export credit facility and the policies around it, will take place in the Dutch Parliament. The coalition calls upon Dutch politicians and policy makers to stand up against any form of export support for fossil fuel projects that are to be executed by Dutch companies abroad, expecially in the global South.
-
News / 24 October 2022Termination of Energy Charter Treaty by the Netherlands helps global energy transition
The decision of Minister for Climate and Energy Rob Jetten to withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) is good news for the energy transition in the Netherlands and beyond. Governments of countries that are party to this treaty can therefore shape the transition to sustainable energy without having to fear claims by Dutch-based businesses.
-
Press release / 29 August 2022Billions of euros a year in support for fossil exports underscores importance of Glasgow Declaration
Amsterdam, 29 August 2022 - A recent study by Both ENDS shows that, in the past decade, the Dutch government has provided on average a billion euros a year in insurance for fossil energy projects. At the end of last year, together with 33 other countries, the Netherlands agreed to stop providing this support by the end of 2022. Both ENDS calls on the government to formulate a resolute policy that leaves no room for exemptions that contribute to global warming by more than 1.5 degrees.
-
Press release / 19 May 2022122 CSOs warn signatory countries they have only six months left to meet COP26 commitment to end international public finance for all fossil fuels
Today, 122 civil society groups are releasing letters to eleven government signatories to the Glasgow Statement on International Public Support for the Clean Energy Transition, laying out the actions they must take as soon as possible to meet their commitment. In this joint statement at COP26, 35 countries and 5 public finance institutions committed to end their international public finance for 'unabated' fossil fuels by the end of 2022, and instead prioritise their "support fully towards the clean energy transition."
-
Press release / 21 April 2023Manifesto: The Netherlands can reduce its international footprint with new Agricultural Agreement
The Dutch Agriculture Agreement, which is currently under development, is too much focused solely on the Netherlands. That is the opinion of a broad coalition of more than sixty NGOs, farmers' organisations, scientists and companies that have today sent an urgent letter to agriculture minister Piet Adema and foreign trade and development minister Liesje Schreinemacher. The government's agricultural policy should also aim to reduce the Netherlands' enormous agrarian footprint beyond our borders, by taking food security and the preservation of biodiversity as its starting points. The coalition has published a manifesto in which it sets out how reform of the Netherlands' foreign agricultural policy could be given shape.
-
Publication / 24 April 2023
-
News / 4 May 202318 reasons for a Dutch agricultural policy with an international perspective
Our manifesto "The Dutch Agriculture Agreement reaches further than the Netherlands: offer prospects for sustainable farmers and consumers worldwide" has now been signed by over 70 civil society organisations, agricultural organisations and companies, environmental organisations and scientists from around the world. Below, a few of them give their personal motivation why they support the manifesto.
-
News / 9 July 2024Help the fight for a world without fossil fuels: sign this initiative
The climate crisis can no longer be ignored. With record temperatures and unprecedented extreme weather conditions, we see the devastating effects of climate change all around the world. The Netherlands has recently faced both unprecedented heatwaves and prolonged rainfall that have severely impacted our agricultural sector. These events painfully highlight: we must act now.
-
News / 16 November 2023Voting with a worldwide impact
Disposable fashion items continue to flood into the country, the nitrogen crisis has brought construction to a standstill and energy poverty is on the rise, but Dutch politicians are contemplating their navels. These are problems that we can never solve on our own. The clothes we wear, the food on our plates, and the electricity that comes out of our wall sockets – they are all produced in global trade and production chains. With far-reaching consequences, both in our own country and far, very far beyond our borders. It would be naive to think that we can solve all these problems through domestic policies alone. And vice versa: we would be evading our responsibilities if we continued to believe that the Netherlands only plays a humble role on the global stage. Latest figures show that the Netherlands is the fourth largest exporter and the seventh largest importer of products worldwide. With the elections on the way, it is time to look beyond our own small country. Because it is also important to vote with a worldwide impact.
-
Blog / 18 November 2024The global rise of authoritarian regimes demands global strategies
The global funding landscape for civil society movements is changing, and is increasingly faced with policies that restrict funding streams, limit philanthropic work, and silence critical voices. These are not incidental shifts but part of a broader pattern that erodes the support for those international networks and movements under the guise ‘necessary financial cuts’, ‘aid reform’ or ‘efficiency’.
-
News / 21 February 2025Cabinet turns its back on international cooperation and solidarity with callous policy letter
Foreign Trade and Development Minister Klever's published policy letter is coldhearted and callous. It places the Netherlands in international isolation and abandons the most vulnerable people worldwide, including many women, farmers, indigenous peoples and youth.
-
Publication / 1 July 2025
-
News / 25 January 2024'We can not have a transition when we do not talk about consumption patterns'
The parliamentary elections in the Netherlands are over, and the dust has somewhat settled. No matter what government emerges from the process, one thing is clear: in the Netherlands the main focus is on the Netherlands. Foreign affairs were hardly mentioned during the elections and the same applies to the process of forming a new coalition. More alarmingly, some of the winners in the elections want to cut themselves off even further from the world around us.
