The European Investment Bank should withdraw from gas investments
The European Investment Bank EIB should get rid of its gas-investments, and the Netherlands can take the lead in this. The Netherlands appears to be relying less and less on gas in its energy policy, and also seems to focus on gas-free investments at the EIB. Now it is important to maintain this position and also convince the other EU countries.
The countries of the European Union will soon be taking a decision on the EIB's energy policy. Banks often see the creation of money by providing credit as a politically neutral instrument to serve and support the economy, and therefore it would normally not be a logical step for the EIB itself to be at the center of a political debate on energy policy. But the bank has an important role to play in the European solutions to the climate crisis. The EIB's energy strategy does in fact matter in achieving the climate targets agreed upon internationally in Paris.
Gas is fossil too
After years of political and public pressure, the EIB has already largely stopped investing in coal and oil, and that is an important step. But from 2013 onwards, the EIB still invested EUR 14.2 billion in gas projects. The majority of this money was allocated to the construction of pipelines. Gas is often seen as a renewable energy source, while it is by no means. Although burning gas produces fewer emissions than burning coal, the EU will certainly not achieve its climate goals within the agreed time if it keeps focusing on gas.
For the climate it is crucial that the use of gas as an energy source stops completely and as soon as possible and therefore Both ENDS believes that the EIB should no longer invest in gas projects. Even EIB's Vice President Andrew McDowell recently told Radio Luxembourg that the story of gas as a "clean transition energy source" needs further consideration.
The Netherlands must convince other countries
This is the first time that someone from the Bank - which was financing a gas pipeline just two years ago to bring gas from Azerbaijan to the EU – dares to make such a statement. Based on the talks that are being held this month by the European countries within the EIB about the Bank's new energy strategy, the Netherlands seems to be taking this position too. Our country could urge other EU-countries to take the same position, although the question is how.
The European Investment Bank is a European institution, but the individual countries are shareholders. Until now, the countries are rather divided among themselves about the use of fossil energy as an energy source and about the period within which this should be phased out. Some countries want to keep access to EIB financing for gas and a country like Poland is not even ready to phase out coal extraction and use.
The most virtuous boy in the classroom
The position of the Netherlands is, however, rather surprising because in a recent past our country made eager use of EIB money to become the 'gas roundabout' of Europe, to enable trade and storage of foreign gas. For example, the EIB has invested in the LNG terminal on Rotterdam's Maasvlakte and in the Gasunie distribution network. This fact may make it more difficult for the Netherlands to convince other countries that the EIB should stop investing in gas, because it could seem opportunistic. After all, the Netherlands already has what it wanted, and would now suddenly pretend to be the most virtuous boy in the classroom.
From an environmental point of view, it is of course good to support the Netherlands in its position that the bank should no longer invest in gas, regardless of the underlying motives. In this process, it is important to interact diplomatically with other countries and to work together with other progressive countries such as Sweden.
European Commission has a role to play
In addition, the new European Commission might play a key role. The Commission itself is on the Bank's board and works with a list of possible energy projects to be subsidized, helping Europe to be sustainable. The Commission therefore has the power to exclude gas projects from this list. It can also exclude gas projects for EU guarantees on EIB loans and monitor EIB compliance with the Paris agreement.
The European Parliament also has a role to play, because the investments that the EIB makes outside Europe fall under the EU's foreign policy, in which the European Parliament has a say. In that role, the European Parliament can also address and question the European Commission about EIB investments.
Decision making within the EIB is a public matter
Yet decision-making could be even more democratic. Topics such as the EIB's energy and climate strategy have been closed behind closed doors, while it concerns public money for projects that are directly related to European policy. It would therefore be logical to make these negotiations transparent and to move them to the democratic domain of the European Parliament.
For more information
Read more about this subject
-
Dossier /Advocating for responsible policies of development banks
Development banks should comply with strict environmental and human rights rules to ensure that their projects benefit and do not harm the poorest groups. Both ENDS monitors the banks to make sure they do.
-
News / 27 februari 2026Both ENDS strengthens the resilience of female environmental defenders worldwide thanks to multi-year contribution from the Postcode Lottery
In recent years, Both ENDS has received an additional contribution of €875,000 from the Postcode Lottery for the Autonomy & Resilience Fund (2022–2025), implemented in collaboration with the Global Alliance for Green and Gender Action (GAGGA). This support was essential because female environmental rights defenders around the world are increasingly facing climate change, repression and shrinking civil space. With this contribution, Both ENDS supports female activists and their communities with flexible, trust-based funding, enabling them to develop their own solutions to urgent environmental and climate problems.
-
News / 2 februari 2026Response to the D66-VVD-CDA coalition agreement
Coalition: Repair the damage and dare to go further
At Both ENDS, we see a number of cautious steps in the right direction in this coalition agreement. There is a slight emphasis on green issues, renewed attention to women's rights, recognition of the importance of civil society, and discussion of trade agreements with a focus on mutual interests. However, without structural change in how we trade, invest, and cooperate, fine words remain empty shells.
-
Dossier /Seeking justice for the affected communities of Vale’s mining disasters in Mariana and Brumadinho
In 2015 and 2019, the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais experienced two severe mining tragedies in Mariana and Brumadinho, due to the same mining company: Vale. Since then, the affected communities have been seeking justice, via the criminal punishment of the responsible parties, and a fair compensation for the loss of their loved ones, their homes and their livelihoods. Both ENDS supports local CSOs by amplifying their quest for justice within an international audience and, more specifically, by raising awareness amongst Dutch investors in Vale about the high risks this company’s activities pose for people and the environment.
-
News / 2 februari 2026Seven years after Brumadinho: impunity allows Vale’s disasters to continue
Seven years ago, the dam owned by mining company Vale collapsed in Brumadinho, Brazil, killing 272 people and severely polluting the surrounding area. While the relatives of the victims commemorate them and fight for justice, the pollution continues.
-
News / 22 januari 2026Shell files new arbitration against the Netherlands over Groningen gas field closure
Shell is suing the Netherlands in yet another attempt to evade its responsibility for decades of gas extraction in Groningen. For years, gas production has triggered earthquakes, damaged over a hundred thousand homes, and left residents living in prolonged insecurity, still waiting for repairs, reinforcement, and justice.
-
Dossier /Agua Zarca: indigenous fight against dam costs lives
Indigenous Hondurans are resisting the construction of the Agua Zarca hydrodam. Their fight has cost several lives, including that of Berta Cáceres. After considerable public pressure, Dutch development bank FMO withdrew from the project.
-
Press release / 13 januari 2026Investigation: FMO failed to exercise adequate control over project linked to the murder of Berta Cáceres
TEGUCIGALPA/UTRECHT, January 12, 2026 – The murder of indigenous environmental activist Berta Cáceres, which took place almost 10 years ago in Honduras, appears to be the result of an organized criminal operation, in which funds from the Dutch Development Bank FMO were misappropriated to finance illegal activities. This is the conclusion of the investigation report published today by the independent commission set up by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the Honduran state, and the relatives of Berta Cáceres.
For years, FMO was a major financier of the Agua Zarca project. Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader, fought against this controversial dam and was murdered for that reason in March 2016.
-
Dossier /Gas in Mozambique
In 2011 one of the world’s largest gas reserves was found in the coastal province of Cabo Delgado, in the north of Mozambique. A total of 35 billion dollars has been invested to extract the gas. Dozens of multinationals and financiers are involved in these rapid developments. It is very difficult for the people living in Cabo Delgado to exert influence on the plans and activities, while they experience the negative consequences. With the arrival of these companies, they are losing their land.
-
Blog / 11 december 2025Reflections on working on Dutch finance for Mozambique LNG
Last Tuesday, I received a short text message with big news: the minister had just announced that the financing policy for the Mozambique LNG project was stopped. It was a decision that I – along with so many others – have fought for for years. Only now, more than a week later, it is slowly sinking in that we have really won. The years of perseverance, frustration, discussions and investigations have finally led to this result. It still feels a bit surreal.
-
Dossier /Export Credit Agencies: Who pays the price?
Both ENDS calls on the government only to provide export credit insurance to sustainable projects that cause no social and/or environmental damage in the countries where they take place.
-
Press release / 2 december 2025End of Dutch involvement in controversial gas project in Mozambique in sight after TotalEnergies withdraws from Dutch insurance
THE HAGUE/CABO DELGADO, December 1, 2025 - Today, Minister of Finance Eelco Heinen announced that TotalEnergies is withdrawing from a $640 million Dutch export credit insurance policy for a controversial gas project in Mozambique. Although the Dutch government has been avoiding this decision for years, this move has finally ended part of the Dutch involvement in this disastrous project.
-
Dossier /Indigenous communities threatened by Barro Blanco dam in Panama
The Barro Blanco dam project in Panama, which has Dutch financial support, is causing indigenous lands to disappear under water. Both ENDS is working to protect the rights of indigenous communities living near the dam.
-
Blog / 1 december 2025The Long Road to Justice for the Ngäbe of Kiad
In October 2025 I travelled to Kiad, the Indigenous Ngäbe community that led the struggle against the FMO-financed Barro Blanco dam, for one last time. I went there to say my goodbyes, both personally and on behalf of Both ENDS, and to catch a first glimpse on how a community program financed by FMO and DEG – the result of a dialogue process that took several years – is giving a new impulse to the dam-affected communities. But how did we get here?
-
News / 27 november 2025Communities and International Consortium Present Community-Led Plan for Nature-Based Adaptation to Sea-Level Rise in Coastal Bangladesh
Local communities in the southwestern coastal region of Bangladesh—together with an international consortium including Uttaran, CEGIS, and Both ENDS—have presented a community-led plan to confront climate change and accelerating sea-level rise through nature-based adaptation. The People’s Plan for Upscaling Ecosystem-Based Adaptation outlines a scalable strategy rooted in local ownership and generations of lived experience. At its centre is Community-Based Tidal River Management (CBTRM), a proven approach that reduces waterlogging, raises land elevation, and restores ecological balance by working with natural tidal and sediment dynamics.
-
Blog / 25 november 2025COP30 shows why dismantling ISDS is essential for real climate action
Standing in Belém during COP30, I felt the weight of the moment. We came to the Amazon hoping for decisive progress on phasing out fossil fuels, yet the final outcome fell far short of the ambition science and justice demand. The agreement brought welcome commitments on adaptation finance and global indicators, but it refused to confront the structural forces that make climate action so difficult.
-
Dossier /Wetlands without Borders
With our Wetlands without Borders program, we work towards environmentally sustainable and socially responsible governance of the wetlands system of the La Plata Basin in South America.
-
Environmentally Just Practice /Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs)
About one in every six people, particularly women, directly rely on forests for their lives and livelihoods, especially for food. This shows how important non-timber forest products (NTFPs) and forests are to ensure community resilience. Not only as a source of food, water and income, but also because of their cultural and spiritual meaning.
-
Dossier /Trade agreements
International trade agreements often have far-reaching consequences not only for the economy of a country, but also for people and the environment. It is primarily the most vulnerable groups who suffer most from these agreements.
-
News / 5 november 2025Another ISDS claim hits the Netherlands: Petrogas sues over solidarity contribution and royalty regulations
SOMO and Both ENDS strongly condemn the newly revealed investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) case filed by Petrogas, an Omani oil and gas company operating two shallow-water gas fields in the Dutch North Sea, against the Netherlands under the Netherlands-Oman bilateral investment treaty (BIT).