Large-scale infrastructural projects have detrimental effects on local people and the environment, while their benefits are felt elsewhere. Both ENDS is working to ensure that local people have a greater say in decision-making and is investigating the way these projects are funded.
Large-scale infrastructural projects, such as dams, canals, airports, harbours, dykes, etc. are planned and build worldwide. Governments see these projects as opportunities to develop their countries. They are often (co)funded by development banks like the World Bank or regional or bilateral banks like the European Investment Bank or the Dutch FMO. Export credit agencies, like the Dutch Atradius DSB, are also involved in these kinds of projects. Critical questions are increasingly being asked about large-scale infrastructural projects: do they genuinely solve the problems they are designed to address or are they primarily beneficial to investors?
Dams: severe damage to people and the environment
Often, these large-scale infrastructural projects do not bring development for everyone, but actually create more poverty and other problems for vulnerable groups of people living in the areas where they are constructed.
Building a dam, for example, often causes enormous damage to the natural environment and thereby the living environment of local inhabitants. They are forced to relocate and lose their homes, their land and the forests from which they live. Farmers downstream are faced with changes in the level of the water, on which they depend to irrigate their land, catch fish for food, wash and play in. Dams destroy a river's ecosystem and the areas around them all the way to the coast. Where large areas of forest end up under water, dams contribute to deforestation, and when trees decay under water, they release a lot of methane, a strong greenhouse gas. Electricity generated by large dams is therefore not as green as it may seem at first glance.
The dam projects that Both ENDS is fighting against together with local inhabitants include the Agua Zarca in Honduras, Barro Blanco in Panama, Pojom in Guatemala and Bujagali in Uganda.
Infrastructure: development or land-grabbing?
Other projects, such as harbours, canals and airports, can also have both positive and negative effects. All of these kinds of projects need land, which is already being used by people or is valuable in environmental terms. In many countries in the South, however, people have been living in their communities on certain lands for centuries but have no official land rights. When large infrastructural projects start, these people lose access to their land, which has an immediate impact on their means of existence. Local fishermen are often adversely affected by harbour projects, which can make their access to the sea more difficult, while the building activities lead to a reduction in fish stocks. Violence is sometimes used to evict people from their homes and land.
Examples include Jakarta, where fishermen's livelihoods are being threatened by the NCICD (Great Sea Wall) project, the Suez Canal, where thousands of people have been driven off their land, Istanbul, where local people and forests are threatened by plans for a new airport, and the Nicaragua Canal, which has an enormous impact om the local people even before the actual digging work has started.
Moreover, harbours and other large-scale infrastructure projects frequently benefit the fossil sector, which means that they indirectly contribute to climate change.
Participation of local people in decisions affecting their living environment
Both ENDS is working to increase the participation of local communities in decisions on large-scale infrastructural projects. They have the right to have a say in what happens to land, forests and waters that they have used and protected for many centuries. Such participation should also guarantee the right of local people to choose other development models that have a less far-reaching impact on their living environments.
Local communities and organisations often do not know who is behind a megaproject and who has an interest in it: what development banks are funding it, what foreign companies will be carrying out the construction activities, whether these companies will be receiving export credit insurance from their own country, what international rules they have to observe and what options there are for obtaining justice.
Both ENDS helps expose these international capital flows and, together with local partners, raises the alarm if large-scale infrastructure projects threaten to have serious negative consequences for the natural and social environment.
We call for the voices of local communities to be heard and for them to be provided with sufficient information to participate in decisions affecting the development of their living environments. We also work to ensure that good social and environmental impact assessments are carried out, with specific attention being given to human rights, and that FPIC (free, prior and informed consent) is being applied. We also help local groups to work out scenarios designed to lead to a greener and more inclusive form of development. And if banks and businesses do not adhere to the rules, we help local communities obtain justice by, for example, attracting the attention of the international media, submitting complaints and demanding reasonable compensation.
For more information
Read more about this subject
Uganda’s Energy Future
Despite the existence of many hydropower dams, foreign investments and large government spending on energy, and new plans for hydropower, oil and gas projects, the vast majority of rural Uganda still remains without electricity. Together with our local partners we are striving towards a sustainable energy strategy for Uganda that starts from the needs and wishes of local communities.
Wetlands without Borders
With our Wetlands without Borders program, we work towards environmentally sustainable and socially responsible governance of the wetlands system of the La Plata Basin in South America.
Agua Zarca: indigenous fight against dam costs lives
Indigenous Hondurans are resisting the construction of the Agua Zarca hydrodam. Their fight has cost several lives, including that of Berta Cáceres. After considerable public pressure, Dutch development bank FMO withdrew from the project.
Fair Green and Global Alliance (FGG)
Together with civil society organisations from all over the world, the Fair Green and Global (FGG) Alliance aims for socially just, inclusive and environmentally sustainable societies in the Netherlands and the Global South.
Indigenous communities threatened by Barro Blanco dam in Panama
The Barro Blanco dam project in Panama, which has Dutch financial support, is causing indigenous lands to disappear under water. Both ENDS is working to protect the rights of indigenous communities living near the dam.
News / 26 October 2022
Senegal: 26 innocent people including Both ENDS' partner arrested in Senegal
Update October 27th:
Today our friends have been released after five nights in detention. We welcome this great news and we are happy and relieved that Babacar Diouf and the others who were arrested will soon be back with their loved ones.
Nonetheless this was a very bad signal from Senegalese authorities and police and an indication of the growing restriction on civic space in Senegal. It is unacceptable that freedom of expression is restricted, people should not have to go to jail for peacefully expressing their opinion - especially when their livelihood is at stake.
News / 22 August 2022
Complaint to development banks about the Nachtigal dam in Cameroon
Both ENDS partner IFI Synergy has filed a complaint to the World Bank on behalf of local inhabitants about the Nachtigal dam in Cameroon. The dam is causing considerable problems for local communities and local people feel that the compensation they receive is inadequate. They also feel that they were insufficiently informed and consulted before construction of the dam started.
Blog / 16 June 2020
The political and industrial elites in Indonesia grasp their opportunity
In September 2019, the streets of Jakarta were filled with angry demonstrators protesting against the Omnibus Employment Law. The law will ease the rules for mining, make it much more difficult to hold companies liable for criminal acts and severely restrict the power of the national anti-corruption committee. At the moment, such protests are completely impossible in Indonesia because of the COVID-19 crisis and the associated lockdown measures. And Indonesian people already had few other means of exerting influence on decision-making and legislative processes.
News / 2 July 2019
‘Like Fish on Land’: testimonies from people in Uganda and Laos after being displaced
In the Nam Ou river in Northern Laos, seven dams are built by a Chinese company. All over the world one can see the same picture when it comes to hydropower projects: it has devastating impacts on the people living in or around the area where they are being built, primarily because they are being displaced. It seems that displacement of communities is still accepted as the unavoidable collateral damage of infrastructure projects. This reveals a highly unacceptable attitude towards poor communities in whose name development is proceeding. In Laos, our Laotian partner visited communities along the river to talk with people about their life after displacement:
Publication / 29 May 2019
News / 15 November 2018
All Eyes on the Amazon: the future of protecting forests in Brazil
On Wednesday, November 14, Dutch Newspaper De Volkskrant published a joint op-ed by Both ENDS, Hivos, Greenpeace Netherlands and Witness about the deforestation in the Amazon region which is still going on rapidly, having disastrous consequences for the indigenous people who live in the area, for biodiversity and for the climate. The Netherlands is one of the largest buyers of Brazilian agricultural products such as soy and beef, and should ensure that deforestation, land grabbing and human rights violations do not occur in these production chains. Unfortunately, this is not at all the case yet.
Blog / 13 November 2018
The "Dutch hero" came to develop "poor Africa"
Last weekend there was an article in Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant about the Lake Turkana Wind Power Project in Kenya. I was surprised and angry about how the story was presented. How can people be so blind to the perspectives of others? And how can a progressive paper like De Volkskrant devote so much space to such an unnuanced account? This is exactly why such projects lead to conflicts.
News / 26 September 2018
Temporary ban on new hydro dams in the Brazilian Pantanal
Good news from Brazil! The National Water Agency (ANA) has stopped issuing new permits for the construction of hydroelectric dams in the Brazilian Paraguay river basin, which is part of the Pantanal wetlands in South-America. The suspension will last at least until May 2020, after the publication of a comprehensive socio-economic and environmental impact assessment that the ANA started in 2016.
External link / 31 May 2018
Promoting local participation in mega-projects (Annual Report 2017)
November 2017. A delegation of the Dutch dredging company Van Oord listens to fishermen from communities around Suape harbour, Brazil. For the fishing communities, the meeting meant a long-awaited breakthrough in their efforts to have their grievances heard. Their fishing grounds have been damaged ever since Van Oord started deepening the sea access channel to the port seven years ago.
News / 4 August 2017
Nicaragua Canal undermines human rights
A report published yesterday by Amnesty Central America shows that the plans for a new canal leads to numerous violations of human rights in Nicaragua. And that's even before the works have started. Many organisations therefore protest against the canal, supported by Both ENDS.
Publication / 21 April 2017
Press release / 21 April 2017
Press release: Indonesian giant sea wall project is pseudo-solution for Jakarta Bay
21 April 2017: Jakarta is sinking. Excessive groundwater extraction is causing the metropolis to sink by dozens of centimetres each year, making it more vulnerable to flooding. Dutch businesses have come up with a solution: an immense sea wall on the coast, which is also a stunning real estate project. But this intervention is just a pseudo-solution, say researchers from Both ENDS, Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen (SOMO) and the Transnational Institute (TNI) today in a new report. Even worse, the project threatens the livelihoods of tens of thousands of people employed in local fisheries.
Publication / 21 April 2017
News / 16 August 2016
Art as a powerful messenger: music from the Pantanal
10 songs: that is the result of a 4 day long, 450 km boat trip through the Pantanal with 36 people. The project Pantanal Poética sought and found a new way to look at the Pantanal, a valuable but threatened nature reserve on the border of Brazil, Bolivia and Paraguay.
News / 2 November 2015
Not soy, but music in the Brazilian Pantanal!
The Pantanal, in the heart of South America, at the border of Brazil, Bolivia and Paraguay, is the world’s largest freshwater wetland with an extremely rich biodiversity. Tourism and fishing are the main sources of income for the local population. This enormous natural area is invaluable for the water management of a large part of the continent, stretching all the way down to the Argentinian La Plata area, some 1,500 kilometres away. The area faces many threats and Both ENDS therefore already started actively supporting local organisations striving to protect the Pantanal in 1994.